A source-checked Reddit feature
100 Industry Claims, Checked Against the Record
Start with what the record supports
Some insider claims survive scrutiny, others become accurate only after narrowing, and many are disputed or incorrect. Readers need the verdict, correction and authoritative source on the same card so the checked answer never becomes detached from its evidence.
- Incorrect and corrected claims
- Disputed claims
- Accurate but narrowed claims
- Safety-corrected claims
- Highest-consequence health, digital and public-system claims
- Named authoritative sources on each card
Complete numbered catalog — all 100 entries
The title promises this exact number of normalized answers, so the complete catalog appears before category navigation.
half the sites you use every day are held together by a handful of exhausted on-call engineers, a pile of scripts nobody fully understands anymore, and duct tape. a surprising amount of the internet is one expired certificate or one fat-fingered config push away from going down for an afternoon.
half the sites you use every day are held together by a handful of exhausted on-call engineers, a pile of scripts nobody fully understands anymore, and duct tape. a surprising amount of the internet is one expired certificate or one fat-fingered config push away from going down for an afternoon.
What the replies added2
Plus they just forced that one legacy engineer who came in for decades in flip flops and a Hawaiian shirt to retire. And he was the only one who understood COBOL or how the mainframe works. But they were able to hire 4 interns with his salary!
A few years ago an open source dev was having some personal issues and wasn’t able to keep up with development on his completely voluntary project that was an important component of major Linux distros. So he handed it off to a dev that was interested in maintaining the project. A dev that was *exceedingly* eager to get their changes committed to the next Debian release. [A backdoor *almost* got installed into all kinds of systems. Hospitals, schools, power plants, email servers.]( [link removed] The hacker used sock puppet accounts to put pressure on the original dev to get access. Just social engineering. *And they almost got away with it.* The backdoor made it into development versions of major distributions. A Microsoft employee noticed something was amiss and dug into it further. We were all 🤏 this close to a *major* fuck up.
The chances of your children's private info, including SSN, birthdate, birthplace, address, etc being leaked and out there on the dark web is fairly high because most school districts in this country have shit network security and work with SaaS vendors that house all this data and are also vulnerable. People heard about the big Canvas hack earlier this year. What people dont seem to realize is that hack wasn't unique and similar events happen fairly often across our country and sometimes to individual school districts. Its a real problem thats just being ignored by our government.
The chances of your children's private info, including SSN, birthdate, birthplace, address, etc being leaked and out there on the dark web is fairly high because most school districts in this country have shit network security and work with SaaS vendors that house all this data and are also vulnerable. People heard about the big Canvas hack earlier this year. What people dont seem to realize is that hack wasn't unique and similar events happen fairly often across our country and sometimes to individual school districts. Its a real problem thats just being ignored by our government.
What the replies added2
Also, you don’t have to give your real SS to most people who ask for it. They don’t actually check. Even doctors offices. They just use your policy number and name to verify. Your SS is not typically needed. And what’s more frustrating, my info has never been leaked due to a weak password. Countless companies have obligated me to use 8 character passwords with symbols and numbers and a mix of caps and each of the times my data has been leaked it’s due to them having bad security.
Given everything in the Epstein files, it’s very evident that this country and this government don’t give a flying fuck about children and their safety.
I have been in academic research for almost 30 years, and the amount of cherry picked or just completely made up data in research papers should concern everyone. In the past it was very rare and now it is almost common practice. It's driven by the pursuit of increasingly scarce funding sources.
I have been in academic research for almost 30 years, and the amount of cherry picked or just completely made up data in research papers should concern everyone. In the past it was very rare and now it is almost common practice. It's driven by the pursuit of increasingly scarce funding sources.
What replies pushed back on4
I trust you’ve seen this? [[link removed] Half of 3,900 social science studies failed replication. But, even worse, ZERO percent in education specifically. A majority in sociology. And not just replication. Zero reviewed education studies failed reproduction, ie., could not be confirmed using their own data and math. This isn’t science.
fellow academic here, this is likely field dependent, PI dependent and not the majority. In 2026 everyone knows the bad apples (see pubpeer, the popularity of retraction watch and Elizabeth biks blog) This post is only serving to drive distrust in the scientific community when it’s mostly not true.
Yeah, I did my university thesis based on a research paper, with the idea to replicate and extend a part of the algorithm. I contacted the authors, and one replied **many** months later, telling me that it didn't really work, that this other completely different technology kinda worked, but not much better. It had taken me so long to get a reply that I had already turned in the paperwork to do that thesis, and had already spent ~1000 dollars in materials (as a poor student, it was a fortune). I was stuck, so I just went ahead with it, I explained the issue to my professor, and we agreed to go ahead, and as part of my thesis find out in which cases it worked, kinda worked, or didn't work. I graduated, but it took me 6 more months than initially planned.
My spouse is trying to get back into academia. Since she's not affiliated with an institution yet, we've just been replicating papers using code in other languages or taking other approaches. It was eye opening to see published work with objectively broken code that provably didn't do what it said it did. Honestly, replicating work is nice. Way cheaper than gathering the initial data, and with compute being so cheap, the barrier to entry is low.
How much personal information people willingly broadcast without realizing it. You don't need fancy dark web hacks or breach databases. 90% of a person's digital footprint, routine, and history can be fully mapped just by stitching together completely public, harmless-looking breadcrumbs.
How much personal information people willingly broadcast without realizing it. You don't need fancy dark web hacks or breach databases. 90% of a person's digital footprint, routine, and history can be fully mapped just by stitching together completely public, harmless-looking breadcrumbs.
What the replies added2
Just because it's not done at gunpoint doesn't mean it's done willingly.
Or by calling my mom who's 82 and is in the beginning stages of dementia...I try to intercept calls as best I can and keep her debit card. She was wanting it the other day because a "nice man from Wells Fargo had noticed fraudulent charges but needed to verify her identity with her debit card # and pin code"
Software is terrible not because of bad developers or bad testing. It's the CEOs who make business decisions to placate stockholders by releasing too soon and/or ignoring known bugs.
Software is terrible not because of bad developers or bad testing. It's the CEOs who make business decisions to placate stockholders by releasing too soon and/or ignoring known bugs.
What the replies added1
I'll disagree somewhat here. Yes, bad leadership sinks a ton of projects, but bad developers can be just as bad. Especially if they're senior enough to also be part of leadership. I say this as I've worked with some people who will deliver "the thing" that works exactly the way they want it to work without consideration for anything else. I've literally seen developers spend the weekend reverse engineering how another library does something just so they could re-implement it because they didn't want to take a dependency on the library. I've also seen an inordinate amount of time spent on getting around policies because they're "stupid" and "keeping me from getting work done" only to have said workarounds cause problems.
AI is a big lie. We built an autonomous agent pipeline internally because our CEO saw that Stripe did the same thing and automated 80% of PRs. We built it. It doesn’t work and still requires major human intervention to get production ready code. A team at my company just presented at a conference how we’ve automated most work using said tool perpetuating the initial lie that tricked us into building the damn thing.
Limit: AI is a big lie. We built an autonomous agent pipeline internally because our CEO saw that Stripe did the same thing and automated 80% of PRs. We built it. It doesn’t work and still requires major human intervention to get production ready code.…
What the replies added1
You have to be really careful with your prompts using it for research and production. For research, it will make up scholarly papers or court cases. Lot of lawyers are getting in trouble because they have ChatGPT doing their casework, and it's manufacturing fake court cases that, when opposition discovers them, can get the case thrown out and the lawyers disciplined or disbarred. For scholarly articles, it will manufacture fake articles. A lot of scientists have seen their names attached to fake articles, and they've figured out that ChatGPT basically looks for a "credible scientist," writes a fake article that satisfies the prompt, and packages the results. ChatGPT just looks for "credible scientist" and will attribute articles about one field of science to someone who works in a dramatically different field. For production, it will manufacture data from thin air. Particularly if you ask it to make cosmetic changes to a prior result. If you say something about making this "look better," thinking it will change the colors on the spreadsheet or something like that, it will actually change the numbers to make them look more attractive. Most of the things it's being used to do, humans know how to do, and there's not so much of a time crunch that it can't be done better by hand. I work for a water utility, and I've never been given a deadline to provide a report that was so rushed that I couldn't meet it with ease.
Data privacy is a myth On Reddit too.
Data privacy is a myth On Reddit too.
What the replies added1
I'd go one step further and say that privacy has never existed. There's a reason so many stories are about the grandma watching out the window, or the nosy neighbor, or whatever. People only ever had privacy in digital space, and only for a very very short period in time. That is NOT to say we SHOULDN'T have privacy. I believe it's a fine goal to work towards. I just don't actually think any society has ever had more than the theater of it.
Free Wifi is a trap. Its data mining. They dont put it in as a favour to you, they're collecting i formation and corporations are using it. I dont know how it works but the amount of information they can glean from you is... Frightening. I was at a seminar on guest wifi where the company selling the access points was telling us about all the information gathering they are capable of... To them it was a selling point. To me it was a good reason never to log on to free wifi again
Free Wifi is a trap. Its data mining. They dont put it in as a favour to you, they're collecting i formation and corporations are using it. I dont know how it works but the amount of information they can glean from you is... Frightening. I was at a seminar on guest wifi where the company selling the access points was telling us about all the information gathering they are capable of... To them it was a selling point. To me it was a good reason never to log on to free wifi again
What the replies added1
It gets even worse. Wi-Fi could be used as a surveillance system, similar to cameras, just using the signals and how they bounce off objects. Apparently it's so accurate, the method is capable of identifying individuals. [link removed]
Astrophysics. People publishing data from space instruments rarely have a good grasp on the details of how that instrument actually performs, especially if it's been in space for awhile. They'll still assume it's performing the same as it did when it launched, which is usually a more idealized version of that instrument. Results in general should have far larger error bars than published and it greatly weakens them. This can even extend to the teams that build the instruments. I was doing a in-depth analysis of two separate space-based instruments that SHOULD agree with each other and they never did. Two spectrometers, observing the same events, giving different results, with errors that don't cover each other's results.
Astrophysics. People publishing data from space instruments rarely have a good grasp on the details of how that instrument actually performs, especially if it's been in space for awhile. They'll still assume it's performing the same as it did when it launched, which is usually a more idealized version of that instrument. Results in general should have far larger error bars than published and it greatly weakens them. This can even extend to the teams that build the instruments. I was doing a in-depth analysis of two separate space-based instruments that SHOULD agree with each other and they never did. Two spectrometers, observing the same events, giving different results, with errors that don't cover each other's results.
What the replies added1
So is the current crisis in cosmology real? Or possibly just gross instrument error?
Prosecutors employ investigators who routinely check social media during pre-trial prep. Stop posting to your social media and delete your history. It’s low hanging fruit to use your public posting history against you. That goes double for divorces and triple for bankruptcy fraud.
Prosecutors employ investigators who routinely check social media during pre-trial prep. Stop posting to your social media and delete your history. It’s low hanging fruit to use your public posting history against you. That goes double for divorces and triple for bankruptcy fraud.
I used to work in cybersecurity. So much of the misery you are subjected to? Theatre, as part of a project built solely for some "senior leader" to be able to put their name on something. Much of the 'technology' is Emperor's New Clothes. Things like 18FA just to read today's lunch menu, or your corporate laptop seeing 99% CPU usage because of some ZTNA bullshit that blocks absolutely everything and prevents you from doing your job? Nah. That is a classic example of sealing all the exits only for the robbers to depart via the entrance. A lot of these hacks and data breaches happen because some teenager has spearphished your IT manager, or phoned up your helpdesk and talked his way into the VMWare estate. And nobody ever learns from it. The whole thing made me miserable and I began to seriously ask why I bothered.
I used to work in cybersecurity. So much of the misery you are subjected to? Theatre, as part of a project built solely for some "senior leader" to be able to put their name on something. Much of the 'technology' is Emperor's New Clothes. Things like 18FA just to read today's lunch menu, or your corporate laptop seeing 99% CPU usage because of some ZTNA bullshit that blocks absolutely everything and prevents you from doing your job? Nah. That is a classic example of sealing all the exits only for the robbers to depart via the entrance. A lot of these hacks and data breaches happen because some teenager has spearphished your IT manager, or phoned up your helpdesk and talked his way into the VMWare estate. And nobody ever learns from it. The whole thing made me miserable and I began to seriously ask why I bothered.
Your college saves lots of data on you, including your birthdate, where you were born, where you went to high school, previous addresses, your mother’s maiden name, and other key data points. Basically most the things that allow identity verification. This data is captured when you’re a student and kept for decades/indefinitely after you graduate. Colleges are also non-profits and those with access to these databases aren’t always well trained in data security. Employees aren’t always fully vetted. These databases are a big liability to society, IMHO.
Your college saves lots of data on you, including your birthdate, where you were born, where you went to high school, previous addresses, your mother’s maiden name, and other key data points. Basically most the things that allow identity verification. This data is captured when you’re a student and kept for decades/indefinitely after you graduate. Colleges are also non-profits and those with access to these databases aren’t always well trained in data security. Employees aren’t always fully vetted. These databases are a big liability to society, IMHO.
What the replies added1
I could fall off the face of the earth and my college's Alumni Association would still find me to ask for donations. It's uncanny.
In social media, most of the posts that ask open form questions are made by bots with a fuck ton of karma in order to make more karma so that they can sell that account to an advertiser later. You'd think that the mods of said social media would simply see right through an obvious marketing scheme, but they'd rather just ban the truth instead.
In social media, most of the posts that ask open form questions are made by bots with a fuck ton of karma in order to make more karma so that they can sell that account to an advertiser later. You'd think that the mods of said social media would simply see right through an obvious marketing scheme, but they'd rather just ban the truth instead.
Market research The figures that look different at a glance might not be statistically different depending on a sample size and how close the proportion is to the "center" (e.g. 45% and 55% probably wouldn't be statistically different on a usual sample size). Speaking of a sample size, for many businesses it's enough to ask around 50-75 people to make a conclusion about a good share of population. And these people usually paid for their answers (though we are trying to hide the brand behind the study), so it's barely representative at all.
Market research The figures that look different at a glance might not be statistically different depending on a sample size and how close the proportion is to the "center" (e.g. 45% and 55% probably wouldn't be statistically different on a usual sample size). Speaking of a sample size, for many businesses it's enough to ask around 50-75 people to make a conclusion about a good share of population. And these people usually paid for their answers (though we are trying to hide the brand behind the study), so it's barely representative at all.
How many big name companies are storing things like credit card details and personal information in plain ass text in a database.
How many big name companies are storing things like credit card details and personal information in plain ass text in a database.
Your online profile, collected from everything you touch electronically knows more about you than anyone you know. It knows more about you than you do. Any kind of IQ test, personality test, which celebrity am I quiz is a psychological profiling tool used to enhance the complete list of all your online activity. Think using a landline telephone helps? A hack called Salt Typhoon has permanently installed software to record every phone call made worldwide. It can't be fixed.
Your online profile, collected from everything you touch electronically knows more about you than anyone you know. It knows more about you than you do. Any kind of IQ test, personality test, which celebrity am I quiz is a psychological profiling tool used to enhance the complete list of all your online activity. Think using a landline telephone helps? A hack called Salt Typhoon has permanently installed software to record every phone call made worldwide. It can't be fixed.
People don't understand. Not even close. What advertising knows. Like. We know you better than you know yourself. We can make you depressed. Happy. Addicted. We can destroy your relationship. We can make you believe you want something. Machine learning algorithms with the amount of data we have on you are so fucking good at exploiting every tiny weakness in your psyche that you'd install adblockers in a hurry if you grasped even a fraction of the capabilities. And even then it's only moderately effective.
People don't understand. Not even close. What advertising knows. Like. We know you better than you know yourself. We can make you depressed. Happy. Addicted. We can destroy your relationship. We can make you believe you want something. Machine learning algorithms with the amount of data we have on you are so fucking good at exploiting every tiny weakness in your psyche that you'd install adblockers in a hurry if you grasped even a fraction of the capabilities. And even then it's only moderately effective.
What the replies added2
I always think of this when people say “our phones are listening”. Like actually it’s even scarier, they don’t *need* to listen. The data and algorithms and marketing people have you down to a T.
> you'd install adblockers in a hurry Already done. *Years* ago.
The biggest open secret in computer science is that the entire modern digital world is a fragile house of cards held together by copy-pasted code, duct tape, and unpaid open-source volunteers. While the public assumes massive banks, airlines, and tech giants run on hyper-optimized code, billions of dollars in infrastructure actually rely on obscure software libraries maintained by solo developers in their spare time. Furthermore, a shocking amount of global financial transactions still run on ancient, 1960s-era COBOL code underneath slick modern apps. Because fixing every bug is too expensive, tech companies regularly ship software filled with hundreds of known glitches, simply filing them away as long as they don't completely crash the system.
The biggest open secret in computer science is that the entire modern digital world is a fragile house of cards held together by copy-pasted code, duct tape, and unpaid open-source volunteers. While the public assumes massive banks, airlines, and tech giants run on hyper-optimized code, billions of dollars in infrastructure actually rely on obscure software libraries maintained by solo developers in their spare time. Furthermore, a shocking amount of global financial transactions still run on ancient, 1960s-era COBOL code underneath slick modern apps. Because fixing every bug is too expensive, tech companies regularly ship software filled with hundreds of known glitches, simply filing them away as long as they don't completely crash the system.
What the replies added1
I know a guy who's a COBOL "job runner". He just runs the COBOL code and when it errors he manually goes in and fixes the data and runs it again. Has been doing that fully remote since about 25 years. He's in the top 1% income bracket and says he basically works an hour a day and waits for error messages the rest of the time. But whenever he takes a vacation all hell breaks loose.
Not my industry, but tapping a card that doesn't ask for a PIN is not secure. A Subway near me was caught stealing cards by capturing the RFID for customers that tapped the POS pad. Happened to me twice before I started using my phone's tap pay instead and keeping the card locked.
Not my industry, but tapping a card that doesn't ask for a PIN is not secure. A Subway near me was caught stealing cards by capturing the RFID for customers that tapped the POS pad. Happened to me twice before I started using my phone's tap pay instead and keeping the card locked.
I work in building profiles of reddit users. We post leading questions to get users to give demographic data about themselves so we can package it and sell it. Rinse and repeat. every day. It's all clearly explained in the T&C page 272 paragraph 6b.
I work in building profiles of reddit users. We post leading questions to get users to give demographic data about themselves so we can package it and sell it. Rinse and repeat. every day. It's all clearly explained in the T&C page 272 paragraph 6b.
microsoft PCs done slow down because the machine is old. It’s designed to do that so you’ll buy another super fast PC and start it all over again
microsoft PCs done slow down because the machine is old. It’s designed to do that so you’ll buy another super fast PC and start it all over again
Algorithm is a terrible word, used as a filler by non technical folks to describe anything they don’t understand. Algorithm is anything a program does. Basically any set of instructions is an algorithm.
Algorithm is a terrible word, used as a filler by non technical folks to describe anything they don’t understand. Algorithm is anything a program does. Basically any set of instructions is an algorithm.
Digital entertainment served via algorithms often includes deliberate frustrating experiences, designed to keep users more engaged. People don't get addicted to static experiences, much like a Casino where you lose 100% of rolls would garner 0 patrons. So they employ random reinforcement techniques, deliberately choosing when to show quality content, garbage content, ragebait content, etc... modeled after a pattern to get users addicted to apps. --- It's pretty commonly known in social media. But multi-player video games employ the same concept, called an: "EOMM" system: Engagement optimized matchmaking. Which is basically the video game publisher profiling users into buckets depending on communication styles/skill/playstyle. And then purposely fitting them into match-made lobbies designed around specific predictive outcome patterns (User will be more likely to play if next X games are X/Y/Z pattern) to milk engagement.
Digital entertainment served via algorithms often includes deliberate frustrating experiences, designed to keep users more engaged. People don't get addicted to static experiences, much like a Casino where you lose 100% of rolls would garner 0 patrons. So they employ random reinforcement techniques, deliberately choosing when to show quality content, garbage content, ragebait content, etc... modeled after a pattern to get users addicted to apps. --- It's pretty commonly known in social media. But multi-player video games employ the same concept, called an: "EOMM" system: Engagement optimized matchmaking. Which is basically the video game publisher profiling users into buckets depending on communication styles/skill/playstyle. And then purposely fitting them into match-made lobbies designed around specific predictive outcome patterns (User will be more likely to play if next X games are X/Y/Z pattern) to milk engagement.
Telecommunications providers store audio-recordings of all calls for a certain period of time. If a customer reports a voice quality problem, they can access that specific recording to diagnose issues like bad audio or dropped connections. The recordings are also made available to law enforcement authorities for criminal investigations when legally requested. Once the retention period expires, the recordings are automatically deleted according to the provider's data retention policy.
Telecommunications providers store audio-recordings of all calls for a certain period of time. If a customer reports a voice quality problem, they can access that specific recording to diagnose issues like bad audio or dropped connections. The recordings are also made available to law enforcement authorities for criminal investigations when legally requested. Once the retention period expires, the recordings are automatically deleted according to the provider's data retention policy.
All those talking about data security is bullshit, your data is stored in clear text in databases where the developer have full access, to. (And all intruders) And it kind of has to be this way, because you simply can't search for an address or anything else on a database if the data is hidden.
All those talking about data security is bullshit, your data is stored in clear text in databases where the developer have full access, to. (And all intruders) And it kind of has to be this way, because you simply can't search for an address or anything else on a database if the data is hidden.
I work in cybersecurity. Almost every company has been hacked. If they haven’t, they’re going to be hacked in the next year or two. Most (like >70%) are social engineering. Phishing. It is surprisingly easy to get people to click on something and have them give their credentials in a fake login window. L
I work in cybersecurity. Almost every company has been hacked. If they haven’t, they’re going to be hacked in the next year or two. Most (like >70%) are social engineering. Phishing. It is surprisingly easy to get people to click on something and have them give their credentials in a fake login window. L
What the replies added1
I used to support dedicated servers and eventually managed the abuse queue. Boy were there a lot of hacked WordPresses with fb, LinkedIn, banking login pages. And child porn. Update yer plug-ins folks
They (anyone paying for the service not just the government) can playback a recording of your session on a website. Not just the links you clicked, but like a screen recording showing what you saw on your screen while scrolling, where your mouse moved even without clicking, etc. it can be played back like a recorded video. You don’t have to click anything at all to give your “data”
They (anyone paying for the service not just the government) can playback a recording of your session on a website. Not just the links you clicked, but like a screen recording showing what you saw on your screen while scrolling, where your mouse moved even without clicking, etc. it can be played back like a recorded video. You don’t have to click anything at all to give your “data”
What the replies added1
Are you absolutely sure on that? I’ve worked in IT almost 13 years and I’ve absolutely seen technology with those features before I’m just a little skeptical (probably just hoping lol) that the government has such verbose logging including streaming video without the user having to install or at least accept a prompt on a private citizens personal computer.
Hospitals have notoriously shitty IT security and frequently get hacked/their systems encrypted.
Hospitals have notoriously shitty IT security and frequently get hacked/their systems encrypted.
I work in education and most of the decisions are made based on legal and funding issues, not child development or learning. We call them the "box people" who sit in cubicles 10 miles away from the nearest child and make decisions without a whit of experience or concern for the practicality of it all. It's especially bad for kids with IEPs or early childhood, where the whole thing becomes a tangled mess of licensing, SPED law, and funding. The actual children become data points, not people with needs. I really believe in public education but it is not currently functional. The bureaucracy alone is failing the kids before they even set foot in the building.
I work in education and most of the decisions are made based on legal and funding issues, not child development or learning. We call them the "box people" who sit in cubicles 10 miles away from the nearest child and make decisions without a whit of experience or concern for the practicality of it all. It's especially bad for kids with IEPs or early childhood, where the whole thing becomes a tangled mess of licensing, SPED law, and funding. The actual children become data points, not people with needs. I really believe in public education but it is not currently functional. The bureaucracy alone is failing the kids before they even set foot in the building.
What the replies added2
God this. I have a child with Autism who was handcuffed by a school resource officer and the Assistant Principal. I am currently in the thick of complaints, appeals, and eyeball deep in legal work.
This sounds extremely frustrating, and I'm not surprised to hear it. I work in municipal government and that "box people" dynamic sounds familiar to me. (Ironically, I am the one in the box... but am neurotically conscious of the issue... and probably overcompensate for it sometimes). I do want to mention, though, that our only child will be going into first grade this fall. He's in a public district west of Minneapolis. His kindergarten experience was absolutely remarkable. I know the "culture" of any workplace is frustratingly abstract and sometimes just total fantasy; but this school, from the principal on down, consists of educators who are clearly invested in fostering an environment of acceptance, creativity, and encouragement. It shows up before any of the curriculum and, in turn, the kids seem excited to learn and they do it well. What impresses me the most is when my son and I are at the playground and elementary students of all ages are engaged with each other as decent little humans who genuinely care about the community. I guess my point is that maybe there is hope. I know the flaws in our education system are largely related to poor funding and bureaucratic structures (or lack thereof) and those things need our attention, but it's also amazing to me how critical the intangible "vibes" of a place are to our kids' development. But maybe it's the best educators who are in tune with this... and then we're back to funding I suppose.
Elementary school teachers and staff get assaulted by students everyday in every school. Not each teacher, everyday but in every school, everyday, at least one teacher/staff is assaulted. Parents don't think it's happening bc we're not allowed to talk about it (or they just don't care - as long as their work day isn't getting interrupted and they have free child care)
Elementary school teachers and staff get assaulted by students everyday in every school. Not each teacher, everyday but in every school, everyday, at least one teacher/staff is assaulted. Parents don't think it's happening bc we're not allowed to talk about it (or they just don't care - as long as their work day isn't getting interrupted and they have free child care)
Most faculty have little to no training in how to teach effectively. Student ratings have zero correlation with learning. Most of the time they are completely ignored. Adjuncts are usually only paid a few thousand for teaching a semester long course, have no health insurance, and many are on food stamps and do gig jobs to survive. 80% of students go to community college with the intention to transfer to a 4-year university and graduate with a bachelor's. Only 15% succeed in doing so. Only 60% nationally graduate from universities, 40% in STEM disciplines.
Most faculty have little to no training in how to teach effectively. Student ratings have zero correlation with learning. Most of the time they are completely ignored. Adjuncts are usually only paid a few thousand for teaching a semester long course, have no health insurance, and many are on food stamps and do gig jobs to survive. 80% of students go to community college with the intention to transfer to a 4-year university and graduate with a bachelor's. Only 15% succeed in doing so. Only 60% nationally graduate from universities, 40% in STEM disciplines.
What the replies added1
What are the reasons for the low success rates for transferring to 4 year universities?
My dad works as a high school teacher, he says “Parents and students think that the system of education works in the best way but actually the bad behaviors of some students in the class make teachers unable to show their full experience although they have it”.
My dad works as a high school teacher, he says “Parents and students think that the system of education works in the best way but actually the bad behaviors of some students in the class make teachers unable to show their full experience although they have it”.
Most professors have no formal training in teaching.
Most professors have no formal training in teaching.
If you’re an academic researcher, working on federal grants such as the ones awarded by NSF, DOE, NIH or others, the academic institution will skim 50-75% of that grant in assessments and overhead. The PI usually receives 25-30% of the award.
If you’re an academic researcher, working on federal grants such as the ones awarded by NSF, DOE, NIH or others, the academic institution will skim 50-75% of that grant in assessments and overhead. The PI usually receives 25-30% of the award.
I work in recycling. Metal recycling to be precise, but I have connections in plastic/e waste/landfills/residential/etc recyling as well Even if you recycle every possible thing you could and think you're doing your part, I'd say a solid third of it goes straight to a landfill without even the attempt to recycle it. Of what's left, maybe a third of that is rejected for whatever reason also to be sent to a landfill. The remainder is actually recycled in some way. There's a lot of reasons why but the biggest by far is simply greed Metal recycling is one of the better, if not the best industry as far as recovery and we still operate with the expectation of significant loss
I work in recycling. Metal recycling to be precise, but I have connections in plastic/e waste/landfills/residential/etc recyling as well Even if you recycle every possible thing you could and think you're doing your part, I'd say a solid third of it goes straight to a landfill without even the attempt to recycle it. Of what's left, maybe a third of that is rejected for whatever reason also to be sent to a landfill. The remainder is actually recycled in some way. There's a lot of reasons why but the biggest by far is simply greed Metal recycling is one of the better, if not the best industry as far as recovery and we still operate with the expectation of significant loss
What the replies added2
Some things can be recycled almost infinitely as they don't really degrade. Metal's one of them. Some things can be recycled because they're so cheap to "reuse" that it doesn't really matter. Things like paper. Some things can be recycled but only at some cost, so they're only used as filler in an otherwise energy-intensive process. Things like glass. And some things, while technically "recyclable" degrade when you do so and cost more to use than the (non-degraded) raw material does to create. Things like most plastics. The bottom line is: Unless somebody is beating a path to your door to take away your rubbish for free... it has no value, either itself or as part of a recycling process. Literally, money is a great analogue for how recyclable something is. If I left a bunch of metal out overnight with a sign to "Help Yourself", I guarantee much of it would be gone quite quickly. It has an inherent value that people will pay for the raw material itself, even in a form that's already been a product for decades. If I left out cardboard? Maybe someone would take a new box, or some toilet roll centres for their kids to do crafts with. If I left out plastics? Nobody would touch them. In fact, I'd probably be fined for littering. Nobody wants them. If those things had ACTUAL VALUE which was profitable after having been recycled... people would be scrambling to take them off me. As it is, I have to pay my taxes, which pay for thousands of tons of the stuff to be collected, which go to a recycling company, who have to be paid to do their job, which involves just ignoring everything but the actual profitable minority, recycling that (often at a loss, buoyed up by subsidies), to generate a 3rd-rate product that basically sells at a loss or it is used to "bulk up" the original product elsewhere because you can get away with degrading the original product by a certain amount without changing its usage, and thus it becomes profitable. If there's no money in it, it's not going to get recycled, and if you put money (subsidies, taxes, etc.) into it and it's STILL not getting recycled... that's because it's not worth doing.
At my child's insistence, we recycle aluminum cans separately and have done so for years. We also end up recycling our boxes in a separate facility rather than the municipal recycling mostly due to the size, but also because most recycling ends up in a dump or in a dump overseas. I've seen our recycling cans getting dumped into the general trash pickup, especially after a holiday.
I worked in the parks industry in Colorado. A certain amount of water is allowed for a city like Denver to keep its golf courses top-notch. That water comes from the western slope, up to several hundred miles away. If only a percentage of that water is used, then you are allowed that new, lesser amount. So they will just keep sprinklers running to avoid having any amount taken away. While the mountains might experience a drought and get hit with wildfires, devastating wildlife, farmlands and homes (due to excessive water use in the front range), the golf courses look great.
I worked in the parks industry in Colorado. A certain amount of water is allowed for a city like Denver to keep its golf courses top-notch. That water comes from the western slope, up to several hundred miles away. If only a percentage of that water is used, then you are allowed that new, lesser amount. So they will just keep sprinklers running to avoid having any amount taken away. While the mountains might experience a drought and get hit with wildfires, devastating wildlife, farmlands and homes (due to excessive water use in the front range), the golf courses look great.
What the replies added2
It ought to be illegal to water golf courses. If the local climate supports grass, fine. If it doesn't, suck it up.
One of the many reasons you hear a *lot* of complaining about the Front Range from people on the Western Slope.
Work in trash, most of yalls recycling goes to the dump. Sometimes straight into a trash truck, sometimes the recycling truck just dumps at the landfill while these 2 examples are rarer it does happen. Most of the recycling at recycle centers just don't make it through and wind up at the dump for some reason or another. Like most plastic, except the shit milk jugs are made of, are just not cost effective to recycle anymore and when it was it was being shipped over seas to be used as fuel... Then you have paper/cardboard, this shit is easily contaminated. Wet? Cardboard has tape? Trash. Someone put a bunch of shit in their recycling can that also contaminate the paper products, shit some neighborhoods I've serviced was 60%+ regular trash in their recycling cans. And that shit wrecks the machinery that sorts that shit if it wasn't caught during hand sorting. Now with that said glass, cans, and milk jugs are consistently recycled properly. The rest is a crapshoot and highly depends on the center it's sent too and what your neighbors put in their cans. Fun bonus info shit you can't recycle but most people think you can: Shredded paper Bubble wrap Wood Styrofoam Plastic bags Electronics Rubber/tires Fabric Garden hoses
Work in trash, most of yalls recycling goes to the dump. Sometimes straight into a trash truck, sometimes the recycling truck just dumps at the landfill while these 2 examples are rarer it does happen. Most of the recycling at recycle centers just don't make it through and wind up at the dump for some reason or another. Like most plastic, except the shit milk jugs are made of, are just not cost effective to recycle anymore and when it was it was being shipped over seas to be used as fuel... Then you have paper/cardboard, this shit is easily contaminated. Wet? Cardboard has tape? Trash. Someone put a bunch of shit in their recycling can that also contaminate the paper products, shit some neighborhoods I've serviced was 60%+ regular trash in their recycling cans. And that shit wrecks the machinery that sorts that shit if it wasn't caught during hand sorting. Now with that said glass, cans, and milk jugs are consistently recycled properly. The rest is a crapshoot and highly depends on the center it's sent too and what your neighbors put in their cans. Fun bonus info shit you can't recycle but most people think you can: Shredded paper Bubble wrap Wood Styrofoam Plastic bags Electronics Rubber/tires Fabric Garden hoses
What the replies added2
We have a separate trash can with a blue lid for recycling, but every trash day I watch the truck come along and they all go right into the truck. It's not even a different compartment. The city recycling center where all that was supposed to go was shut down years ago, and the building now houses a bunch of road department equipment.
Wood can't be turned to paper? Is it bcsof chemical treatments?
Oil & gas industry - after the BP blow out in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, there were immense efforts to clean up all the spilled oil floating on top of the sea water. BP outsourced the clean up efforts to a company called Nalco which utilized a “dispersant” called Corexit. The dispersant is basically a fancy version of dawn dish soap. AKA, the oil attaches itself to the dispersant and becomes too heavy to float and essentially sinks to the bottom of the ocean out of view of any cameras and news networks. Yes, you guessed it, the oil is still there. Just sunk at the bottom of the ocean.
Oil & gas industry - after the BP blow out in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, there were immense efforts to clean up all the spilled oil floating on top of the sea water. BP outsourced the clean up efforts to a company called Nalco which utilized a “dispersant” called Corexit. The dispersant is basically a fancy version of dawn dish soap. AKA, the oil attaches itself to the dispersant and becomes too heavy to float and essentially sinks to the bottom of the ocean out of view of any cameras and news networks. Yes, you guessed it, the oil is still there. Just sunk at the bottom of the ocean.
sooo much soil is polluted, it's crazy, and the governement would need a loooot of money to remove it all responsibly. meanwhile it all threatens our soilwater (our drinking water), flora and fauna. there's so much going on.
sooo much soil is polluted, it's crazy, and the governement would need a loooot of money to remove it all responsibly. meanwhile it all threatens our soilwater (our drinking water), flora and fauna. there's so much going on.
State environmental permits for discharging contaminants into a body of water are often written in terms of concentration, not quantity. In order to continue to operate while remaining compliant with the permit sites often just increase the amount of water they are discharging, lowering the concentration of the contaminant. Doesn’t make a damn bit of difference in the large body of water it ends up in.
State environmental permits for discharging contaminants into a body of water are often written in terms of concentration, not quantity. In order to continue to operate while remaining compliant with the permit sites often just increase the amount of water they are discharging, lowering the concentration of the contaminant. Doesn’t make a damn bit of difference in the large body of water it ends up in.
Most water fountains don’t have a filter. You’re just drinking regular city/county tap water. The same water that flushes the toilet.
Most water fountains don’t have a filter. You’re just drinking regular city/county tap water. The same water that flushes the toilet.
Most trees don't need to be trimmed. Big tree trimming companies that work for municipalities are the worst scum bags who lobby the cities and city tree guy to pay them to trim trees they sometimes don't or take a branch or two off. The only time trees need to be trimmed is if they are a danger to the public or infrastructure but just having a heavy/natural top is no danger. These trees have been around longer than humans and some how there's an industry profiting off of their abuse. We need more trees and it's great when these companies promote planting them where they'll survive but the shady side none of them admit is it's a for profit business and they need to be trimming regardless of whether trees need it or not
Most trees don't need to be trimmed. Big tree trimming companies that work for municipalities are the worst scum bags who lobby the cities and city tree guy to pay them to trim trees they sometimes don't or take a branch or two off. The only time trees need to be trimmed is if they are a danger to the public or infrastructure but just having a heavy/natural top is no danger. These trees have been around longer than humans and some how there's an industry profiting off of their abuse. We need more trees and it's great when these companies promote planting them where they'll survive but the shady side none of them admit is it's a for profit business and they need to be trimming regardless of whether trees need it or not
A lot of the drinking water you get from the tap is just the wastewater from upstream that has been treated.
A lot of the drinking water you get from the tap is just the wastewater from upstream that has been treated.
An overdraft fee is actually an incredibly high interest rate loan but, since they call it a fee and it doesn't vary with the charge amount it doesn't have to follow interest rate caps. For example, if you pay a $35 fee to cover $100 and have to pay it back with your next paycheck (assume 2 weeks) that is an interest rate of 913%
An overdraft fee is actually an incredibly high interest rate loan but, since they call it a fee and it doesn't vary with the charge amount it doesn't have to follow interest rate caps. For example, if you pay a $35 fee to cover $100 and have to pay it back with your next paycheck (assume 2 weeks) that is an interest rate of 913%
What the replies added2
Is there an effective way to get an overdraft fee waived? I don't care about ethics as an aside lol.
Yup and the scammers putting people into overdraft getaway with the victim paying it as well as the rest of the banks clients paying it off in essence. Then the bank gets to either right off total fraud losses to either insurance or in their taxes again at the expense of its clients
I work in finance. typically helping people with debt, budgeting, investing - most people don’t know that credit card interest accrues on a daily basis and that their APRs skyrocket to 30% when their accounts get maxed out. Most clients think the credit card companies on our their side….yeah they want you in the 40 year interest cycle lol. credit card companies are not your friends
I work in finance. typically helping people with debt, budgeting, investing - most people don’t know that credit card interest accrues on a daily basis and that their APRs skyrocket to 30% when their accounts get maxed out. Most clients think the credit card companies on our their side….yeah they want you in the 40 year interest cycle lol. credit card companies are not your friends
Ex auditor of big 4. The audited report isn't as "yay no fraud" as most people think. There is even a line stating along the phrase "reasonably confident the report is not materially misstated". Don't take it as bullet-proof.
Ex auditor of big 4. The audited report isn't as "yay no fraud" as most people think. There is even a line stating along the phrase "reasonably confident the report is not materially misstated". Don't take it as bullet-proof.
Tax accountant. No the the IRS does not know how much you owe. You want to be try to be precise as possible though incase you are audited. If you are audited then they will know exactly how much you should owe for that year.
Tax accountant. No the the IRS does not know how much you owe. You want to be try to be precise as possible though incase you are audited. If you are audited then they will know exactly how much you should owe for that year.
I’m an accountant and worked for the IRS. I don’t think most people realize how common tax avoidance is, whether that’s just not filing a return or filing a return that understates the tax liability. The IRS studies something known as the tax gap. Simply put, it’s the difference between what the IRS calculates the country’s tax liability is versus what actually ends up being collected. The latest data from 2022 puts the tax gap at over $600 billion per year.
I’m an accountant and worked for the IRS. I don’t think most people realize how common tax avoidance is, whether that’s just not filing a return or filing a return that understates the tax liability. The IRS studies something known as the tax gap. Simply put, it’s the difference between what the IRS calculates the country’s tax liability is versus what actually ends up being collected. The latest data from 2022 puts the tax gap at over $600 billion per year.
What the replies added1
When I started in industry, I was so shocked how many people didn’t file. I was naive and thought everyone paid in and filed lol.
Public Libraries have to beg local and state (mostly state) governments for funding. Most of the cool stuff your local library has added? Yeah that came from either grants or donations. The actual funding is fought for very hard every single day. The best thing you can do to support public libraries? 1) get a library card most importantly, 2) get involved and vote in local and state elections, 3) go utilize all the free shit available at libraries so we keep getting money to continue having that cool stuff for you guys.
Public Libraries have to beg local and state (mostly state) governments for funding. Most of the cool stuff your local library has added? Yeah that came from either grants or donations. The actual funding is fought for very hard every single day. The best thing you can do to support public libraries? 1) get a library card most importantly, 2) get involved and vote in local and state elections, 3) go utilize all the free shit available at libraries so we keep getting money to continue having that cool stuff for you guys.
What the replies added1
I love the resources at my local library. I get free printing credit each month, which is awesome since I don't own a color printer. They rent out passes for our local state parks so that I don't have to pay the entrance fee. I've also heard of them hosting fix-it clinics where people can bring in broken (small) appliances/gadgets and get help with fixing them. That's probably just a few of the many awesome services they provide.
I'm a social worker in a medium sized city with a bad reputation for having a lot of homeless people. I frequently interact with homeless folks, as well as people who are on the verge of losing their housing. You will often hear people say things like, they don't want to get help, they chose this, they're all on drugs, etc etc. Yes, sometimes that's true, but from my experience it is not the majority of cases. The most common thing I hear for why people become homeless is an unexpected loss of income. This could be getting fired or laid off, or an income earner in the home leaves or dies, or a medical situation makes it impossible for them to work. Things like this happen all the fucking time. So many Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, and if you lose that paycheck for even a month or two, everything falls apart. People can lose their housing in the blink of an eye. To add insult to injury, once you become homeless, it is so fucking difficult to get out. There are nowhere near enough resources for all homeless people to get sheltered. Even if they are determined to get into a shelter bed, it often takes weeks or even months. Even, and sometimes especially, families with children. There are just are not enough resources, funding, beds, counselors, etc etc etc. It's hard as fuck to find work as a homeless person. You don't have an address to put on a resume (or a laptop to make the resume). Homeless folks often lose all of their belongings in tent sweeps, including documents like IDs, birth certificates, etc. Folks living on the streets are frequently victims of theft and sexual assualt. They are exposed to the elements. Their bodies break down faster. And all of this is before we even get to the subject of how homeless folks are treated by everyone else, despite the fact that they may themselves be one or two missed paychecks away from being in the same situation.
I'm a social worker in a medium sized city with a bad reputation for having a lot of homeless people. I frequently interact with homeless folks, as well as people who are on the verge of losing their housing. You will often hear people say things like, they don't want to get help, they chose this, they're all on drugs, etc etc. Yes, sometimes that's true, but from my experience it is not the majority of cases. The most common thing I hear for why people become homeless is an unexpected loss of income. This could be getting fired or laid off, or an income earner in the home leaves or dies, or a medical situation makes it impossible for them to work. Things like this happen all the fucking time. So many Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, and if you lose that paycheck for even a month or two, everything falls apart. People can lose their housing in the blink of an eye. To add insult to injury, once you become homeless, it is so fucking difficult to get out. There are nowhere near enough resources for all homeless people to get sheltered. Even if they are determined to get into a shelter bed, it often takes weeks or even months. Even, and sometimes especially, families with children. There are just are not enough resources, funding, beds, counselors, etc etc etc. It's hard as fuck to find work as a homeless person. You don't have an address to put on a resume (or a laptop to make the resume). Homeless folks often lose all of their belongings in tent sweeps, including documents like IDs, birth certificates, etc. Folks living on the streets are frequently victims of theft and sexual assualt. They are exposed to the elements. Their bodies break down faster. And all of this is before we even get to the subject of how homeless folks are treated by everyone else, despite the fact that they may themselves be one or two missed paychecks away from being in the same situation.
What the replies added2
Its awful. I work in public and social housing and it was quite confronting hearing some stories. People that say majority are drug effected or immigrants are the people I love to re educate or destigmatise. Majority of homelessness in Australia are women over the age of 50, who have been devoted mothers or care givers. Went through a divorce or break up / loss of partner and as they had been out of work for years to parent or care give, they dont have recent experience that its so hard to get back in workforce. And because women earn less or have been out of work to care or provide, there usually isnt much in their super and they end up homeless at retirement. Its sad but hopefully with more people like us dropping comments here and there it will help spread more awareness.
I like the housing first approach to homelessness. You just put people in houses and then they’re no longer homeless, and THEN they can begin to work on problems like securing income, etc
Government agencies will blow money on shit that’s not necessarily needed at the end of the year to burn up the rest of the money in their budget. If they don’t spent all the money their budget will get reduced next year.
Government agencies will blow money on shit that’s not necessarily needed at the end of the year to burn up the rest of the money in their budget. If they don’t spent all the money their budget will get reduced next year.
What the replies added1
In the US, the end of the fiscal year is in September so they will also keep shitty people on staff, keep broken machinery or other items that are "in the process of being reviewed for <dismissal/replacement>". They do this while spending wildly on bullshit to finish out the budget and have a reason to ask for more money every year. The US government, because of shit like this and a hell of a lot more, is one of the most inefficient groups of people (as a whole) I've come across in my years of working.
Screenwriters who write for TV don't really write specific episodes. The union requires that someone be credited for each episode and they technically do actually sit down and write it, but between the writers room thourouly outlining the episode and all the extra drafts and revisions afterward (sometimes even full rewrites) it would be much more accurate to say that the whole room writes every episode.
Screenwriters who write for TV don't really write specific episodes. The union requires that someone be credited for each episode and they technically do actually sit down and write it, but between the writers room thourouly outlining the episode and all the extra drafts and revisions afterward (sometimes even full rewrites) it would be much more accurate to say that the whole room writes every episode.
What replies pushed back on1
Disagree, only because not every show has a writers room. Only the big ones do. My ex-husband works on smaller shows and they literally only ever have 1 person writing each episode.
Military and commercial manufacturers bid for jobs. Much like getting a house remodeled by a handyman over a remodeling company. The projects go to the lowest bidder and budget restrictions are made for any improvement ideas from the workers that’ll produce better or faster results. All in the means to keep the management pockets full with bigger bonuses. So all the projects for commercial or military applications are therefore built half-assed and under budget. Quality is still there but with what you can make out of it. All these companies value innovation and efficiency yet when it comes down to it. They lack severely. So when you’re flying or using a specific hardware heavy technology. It’s very possible it could’ve been manufactured better or faster but it didn’t because someone’s pocket got full instead of the actual project. This issue also stems into every aspect of our lives. From doctors to lawyers to police to anything with a management oversight. They’d rather focus on their bonuses being hefty while our processes continue to be mediocre.
Military and commercial manufacturers bid for jobs. Much like getting a house remodeled by a handyman over a remodeling company. The projects go to the lowest bidder and budget restrictions are made for any improvement ideas from the workers that’ll produce better or faster results. All in the means to keep the management pockets full with bigger bonuses. So all the projects for commercial or military applications are therefore built half-assed and under budget. Quality is still there but with what you can make out of it. All these companies value innovation and efficiency yet when it comes down to it. They lack severely. So when you’re flying or using a specific hardware heavy technology. It’s very possible it could’ve been manufactured better or faster but it didn’t because someone’s pocket got full instead of the actual project. This issue also stems into every aspect of our lives. From doctors to lawyers to police to anything with a management oversight. They’d rather focus on their bonuses being hefty while our processes continue to be mediocre.
What the replies added2
They are more holding companies in my view. Holding long term contracts as a revenue stream rather than delivering a product. Like Jack Welch and GE.
>The projects go to the lowest bidder and budget restrictions are made for any improvement ideas from the workers that’ll produce better or faster results This is not entirely correct. For small projects, perhaps, but not large ones. There are a lot of factors that go into awarding a contract. Here are a few. 1. Ability to execute the contract 2. Design/plan to complete the program 3. Reputation of the company 4. Cost I have worked for a government contractor for 20 years and have lost contracts we were the lowest bidder on and won contracts where we were higher than our competitors.
The amount of money made in video games over encouraging dopamine and gambling addiction in children is so large that I'm honestly surprised there's been no serious attempts at legislation.
The amount of money made in video games over encouraging dopamine and gambling addiction in children is so large that I'm honestly surprised there's been no serious attempts at legislation.
What the replies added2
The first part of your sentence answers the second part - money.
That's true and all but I found it funny reading this on reddit.
Those commercials for pharmaceuticals everyone says they hate? The odds someone sees an ad and asks their doctor about the drug? 80%. The odds that the doctor will subsequently prescribe it? 70%. Those are really big numbers. Notice how all the ads are for long term chronic conditions? No one-off 5 day courses of antibiotics getting air time. All the ads are for new drugs, of course. That being said, 95% of them are “me too” drugs. No better than what’s already available and likely generic: just another drug company wanting a piece of the pie and making you think it’s the greatest invention since sliced bread. Only 5% are novel, meaning superior or first of a kind. Big Pharma may be evil and pernicious, but they ain’t stupid.
Those commercials for pharmaceuticals everyone says they hate? The odds someone sees an ad and asks their doctor about the drug? 80%. The odds that the doctor will subsequently prescribe it? 70%. Those are really big numbers. Notice how all the ads are for long term chronic conditions? No one-off 5 day courses of antibiotics getting air time. All the ads are for new drugs, of course. That being said, 95% of them are “me too” drugs. No better than what’s already available and likely generic: just another drug company wanting a piece of the pie and making you think it’s the greatest invention since sliced bread. Only 5% are novel, meaning superior or first of a kind. Big Pharma may be evil and pernicious, but they ain’t stupid.
What the replies added1
I'm a physician and despise those commercials. When I was a kid direct to patient marketing was still illegal. Difficult people may get it prescribed if the doctor just wants to keep them happy and compliant as a patient, but they are completely unnecessary. The doctors already know all about the drugs. In fact when I was in my first family medicine rotation they were still getting drug reps showing up with sweet lunches and their little packets for physicians so they could pitch us why their drug which was basically the same as standard of care should be prescribed instead. If your drug needs warnings a mile long, or you're talking about conditions like multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, subtypes of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, HER2/PR/ER triple negative breast cancer, etc... either you're a highly educated patient with a chronic condition you already understand the treatment protocol for, or you have absolutely no fucking idea what any of it means and whether you're a candidate or if it would even help you at all. You're right that often it convinces customers they're super smart and they should go pester the doctor because they're too dumb to think of it and if they don't want to give it to you it must be because they're bad doctors. I hate the whole pro-big pharma profit marketing system, it's complete garbage for providers and patients. The catchy jingles with bold claims and auctioneer-speed fine print are way more convincing that an in-office conversation about benefit vs risk, standard of care, the strength and validity of their published statistics, the mechanism of action, etc etc etc. So yes indeed the company gets to profit off patients insisting on something that likely won't benefit them if they weren't already on it, to the detriment of the patient and the healthcare system as a whole. Physicians are required to do continuing education and remain board certified and keep up to date with the latest literature and drugs, and the reps have worked twice as hard to make sure their brand name is already known by prescribers before those commercials ever flood your airwaves. Have I mentioned how pointless and absurd the whole thing is for the actual healthcare system and how much I hate it? It's everything that's wrong with our broken system (and country at this point): profits and corporations over cost and outcomes.
Almost no small businesses do what they should for cybersecurity of your data. They aim to check the minimal number of boxes to meet agreements and insurance requirements (and even then it may be more theatre than substance) Independently owned healthcare organizations are often even worse. HIPAA and other compliances are often incompletely implemented . If it doesn’t make money for the business and/or the risk doesn’t seem imminent- investments in security and even changes in basic behaviors are often ignored.
Almost no small businesses do what they should for cybersecurity of your data. They aim to check the minimal number of boxes to meet agreements and insurance requirements (and even then it may be more theatre than substance) Independently owned healthcare organizations are often even worse. HIPAA and other compliances are often incompletely implemented . If it doesn’t make money for the business and/or the risk doesn’t seem imminent- investments in security and even changes in basic behaviors are often ignored.
the computer code for banks is basically spaghetti held together with chicken wire and tape.
the computer code for banks is basically spaghetti held together with chicken wire and tape.
Farmed salmon are so overcrowded that they get sick and develop sores. It's absolutely disgusting, and it's awful to see them suffering.
Farmed salmon are so overcrowded that they get sick and develop sores. It's absolutely disgusting, and it's awful to see them suffering.
What the replies added2
I worked in the industry before in Canada, there is a grade they don't want you to know about called "Utility grade", this grade is the stuff of nightmares. I have seen fish with 3 eyes, two mouths, wavy spines, curvy spines, salmon shaped like a perch, skinny ones, fat ones, some with massive bellies that sag. so many genetic defects and diseases, absolute abominations, realistically they constitute maybe 5 to 10 % of a harvest. Shady stuff goes on in the industry , sometimes they harvest because an algae bloom killed all their fish, so people get called in to do a night shift to do an emergency process of the already dead fish, I know of one case where this happened for sure. They pollute the ocean and spread disease to the wild salmon stocks as well, nasty business.
There’s a really good documentary on YT about a Norwegian professor, long story short Monsanto (creators of agent orange), make the chemicals which go into the fish food (Baltic sand eels; already bad due to historical industrial run off around the sea), and the main chemical to stop it going rancid is Ethoxyquin. It’s highly toxic and can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, heavily regulated in livestock but not fish farming. Norwegians salmon had something like 10,000x the legal limit (salmon are predators with high fat content and the toxins carry upward through the food chain). The professor was made to rescind her paper and resign as the board of the university was also the largest stakeholder in Norway’s 2nd largest salmon farm. Edit: I think this is it for those interested: 2nd edit: Researcher not professor, context is the same. [[link removed]
The housekeeping industry. Housekeepers are under such tight time restraints (30 min per room) and given like 15 rooms to clean in 8 hrs that they are forced to cut corners. Never trust the coffee pot, towels, bedding (the duvet is never changed only if there’s a strain on it or it smells really bad or something), don’t trust the glasses, and don’t walk around barefoot. I’ve seen housekeepers using the toilet brush to clean the bathtub. And touching the clean towers after touching the toilet. Unfortunately there’s not enough time to really clean so we give the illusion of a clean room. Management only cares that the metal is shiny with no water spots, there’s no hair anywhere, and everything is in its place and looks organized. But really it’s gross!
Limit: The housekeeping industry. Housekeepers are under such tight time restraints (30 min per room) and given like 15 rooms to clean in 8 hrs that they are forced to cut corners. Never trust the coffee pot, towels,…
What the replies added2
I have 25 minutes per room and I am to be done 5 hours sometimes 6 hours if we are busy. I work at a holiday Inn. It's ridiculous! I love cleaning and being a housekeeper but the room time are insane and don't allow for proper cleaning.
I cleaned rooms too but I had to quit because they wouldn't let me do my job properly. 100% quality scores but I was supposed to do the room in 15 minutes.
Fountain soda machines are disgusting 90% of the time. Even the places that claim to clean and service them regularly. The amount of time it takes to properly clean them along with poor placement means it's usually to much hassle for everyday employees to properly clean and replace filters of they do it all. I work with technicians that do service calls to restaurants and gas stations daily and the condition of almost all the machines is sickening.
Fountain soda machines are disgusting 90% of the time. Even the places that claim to clean and service them regularly. The amount of time it takes to properly clean them along with poor placement means it's usually to much hassle for everyday employees to properly clean and replace filters of they do it all. I work with technicians that do service calls to restaurants and gas stations daily and the condition of almost all the machines is sickening.
What the replies added3
Restaurant and fast food ice makers are even worse
Same with most soft serve machines. I assisted my mom with her new store she got almost a decade ago now, we thoroughly cleaned the store and I began working on the soft serve machine, we had already ordered the maintenance kit, and a few other pieces for it, so i could go straight to work on it. I emptied the chambers for the creamers and the pan immediately showed a film of mold in both chambers, it was all the way through to the spindle that pressurise the cream before air is added. Its not uncommon but it shouldnt happen if you follow the basic maintenance schedule on it, which is done at least once a week. Took out all the necessary parts, cleaned them up, sterilised them according to health codes. Applied new gaskets and rotary shaft for the spindle (broken teeth on the gear, was a pain to fit) applied new lubes, new gasket and reassembled, ran through a batch of creamer on both sides, cleaned with water and then a refill. Then it was ready. The soft serve was sooooo much better that when the little local newspaper came in, when writing a story about the new manager. They wrote that the new life in the shop had even made the soft serve taste better, if only they knew.
I worked at a lunchroom which was actually really clean because they made it important to be clean. Simple things like putting dates on everything and throwing it out in time, cleaning the coffee machine everyday, the oven every week, changing the fryer oil often, things like that. Then a few months after I left, other owners took over. A few months in, their coffee machine stopped working, their snacks tasted a bit off, bread tasted burnt. Turns out, they wouldn't change the fryer oil enough, cleaned the oven properly, hadn't cleaned the dishwasher (cutlery and plates weren't clean)... And didn't even know the coffee machine had its own cleaning program. They had to rehire the old manager to _explain_ the cleaning to them. They also found a *completely mouldy blue* snack behind some drawers 😭 It was disgusting, disregarded most of her advice, and they just laughed it off.
If you are ever on a long term care insurance plan to receive assistance from a home health aide, DME, etc. There are two facts: 1. Case managers are actively being told to give you the least amount of hours of assistance per week as possible. 2. If you become the ultimate Karen you will ALWAYS get what you ask for. It will take time to go up the chain but you will win. 50 hours of care per week? Complain. New shower? Complain. New Wheelchair? Complain. I'm talking daily conversations with the worker, supervisor, regional manager, etc. I promise you, it will get done. So be the squeaky wheel. Insurance banks on you giving up the fight and they don't want to deal with a judge in a hearing over the issue. They'll give in eventually.
If you are ever on a long term care insurance plan to receive assistance from a home health aide, DME, etc. There are two facts: 1. Case managers are actively being told to give you the least amount of hours of assistance per week as possible. 2. If you become the ultimate Karen you will ALWAYS get what you ask for. It will take time to go up the chain but you will win. 50 hours of care per week? Complain. New shower? Complain. New Wheelchair? Complain. I'm talking daily conversations with the worker, supervisor, regional manager, etc. I promise you, it will get done. So be the squeaky wheel. Insurance banks on you giving up the fight and they don't want to deal with a judge in a hearing over the issue. They'll give in eventually.
What the replies added1
DME is tough because margins are extremely low to the point these companies can barely hit positive ebitda. Really the insurance companies have them on such a loop with fee schedules and lowering margins each year that it may come a time DME is just not worth it to do anymore. Insurance companies need to raise rates and increase fee schedules so patients can be happy. Not even including the nonsense of prior auth hoops, time wasting denials, and needless amounts of documentation.
Chefs in restaurants don’t wear gloves hardly ever- because gloves are dirty and gross. Corporate places that insist on gloves result in cooks wearing the gloves for a long period of time, resulting in cross contamination. If I’m making your food without gloves I am very clean and tidy and I wash my hands a lot. I only wear them when dealing with sloppy wet stuff. What I’m saying is that gloves are in absolutely no way a sign of cleanliness or lack of contamination.
Chefs in restaurants don’t wear gloves hardly ever- because gloves are dirty and gross. Corporate places that insist on gloves result in cooks wearing the gloves for a long period of time, resulting in cross contamination. If I’m making your food without gloves I am very clean and tidy and I wash my hands a lot. I only wear them when dealing with sloppy wet stuff. What I’m saying is that gloves are in absolutely no way a sign of cleanliness or lack of contamination.
What the replies added1
I would go through a box a day when I was working the line, espically the OG Chili's Tenders. The place I was at during COVID even had a line watch, if we touched anything like our face our another product, a reminder to change gloves. When I was FOH there every time you entered the Kitchen Glove change. Its' not true everywhere. Yes I agree they give a false sense of security. But I still use them at home as a glove change is faster then a hand wash.
Vegetables that come canned are cooked in the can.
Vegetables that come canned are cooked in the can.
What the replies added2
Ive heard that peaches come in a can, they were put there by a man
That's the entire point. Everything inside the can is sterialised by cooking and has no access to oxygen. That's why canned food lasts forever.
Retired now, but your health insurance routinely denies anything out of the ordinary - challenge it!
Retired now, but your health insurance routinely denies anything out of the ordinary - challenge it!
I don’t know how shocking it is but at least in the US, all those regulations on chemicals like PFAS’ and other environmentally dangerous compounds? Those regulations rely on the manufacturers reporting their hazards to the DOT. If a company is, say, wrong about a hazard due to a lack of testing because they keep their labs stocked with out of date equipment, those reports aren’t necessarily gonna be accurate.
I don’t know how shocking it is but at least in the US, all those regulations on chemicals like PFAS’ and other environmentally dangerous compounds? Those regulations rely on the manufacturers reporting their hazards to the DOT. If a company is, say, wrong about a hazard due to a lack of testing because they keep their labs stocked with out of date equipment, those reports aren’t necessarily gonna be accurate.
Lots of vodka and gin from “craft” distilleries is just bulk neutral spirits from larger more industrial distilleries redistilled to recut the heads and tails and incorporate botanicals. No starch conversion, sugar extraction, or fermentation is taking place on premises to create of these products.
Lots of vodka and gin from “craft” distilleries is just bulk neutral spirits from larger more industrial distilleries redistilled to recut the heads and tails and incorporate botanicals. No starch conversion, sugar extraction, or fermentation is taking place on premises to create of these products.
What the replies added1
I've seen these at markets, local vodka which is just imported grape spirit and flavour
Agriculture. The amount of farmers and pest control/crop advisors who lie about what pesticides are being used on their crops is staggering. Even on crops that are technically organic, or are exported to other countries with stricter regulations. I work in one of the most strictly regulated states in the US and the reporting and auditing process basically amounts to "just trust me bro"
Agriculture. The amount of farmers and pest control/crop advisors who lie about what pesticides are being used on their crops is staggering. Even on crops that are technically organic, or are exported to other countries with stricter regulations. I work in one of the most strictly regulated states in the US and the reporting and auditing process basically amounts to "just trust me bro"
Rabies testing (if required) means after an animal is euthanized, we have to sever their head, and one of us has to deliver the head (in a cooler on ice) to the state health department.
Rabies testing (if required) means after an animal is euthanized, we have to sever their head, and one of us has to deliver the head (in a cooler on ice) to the state health department.
The biggest open secret in insurance that the public doesn’t realize is that most carriers aren’t really making their money off your premiums—they are essentially massive hedge funds wearing a hard hat. The actual goal of an insurance company is to collect billions in premiums, pay out as little as possible in claims for as long as possible, and invest that massive pile of money (the "float") into real estate, private equity, and high-yield markets. The premiums you pay just give us the chip stack to play Wall Street, which is why a company can technically lose money on coverage for years and still report record-breaking profits. Because of this, the entire claims process isn't just about verifying if your loss was real; it's heavily engineered as a game of administrative attrition. Initial denials, endless requests for repetitive paperwork, and confusing policy jargon aren't always accidental red tape—they're calculated friction. Regulators know it, and the industry knows it, but the business model relies on the fact that a massive percentage of people will simply get exhausted, frustrated, or confused and give up on pursuing a payout they’re fully entitled to. On top of that, your loyalty to an insurance carrier is actively weaponized against you through something called "price optimization." Actuarial algorithms don't just calculate your actual risk of having an accident or a house fire; they calculate how likely you are to notice a rate hike and shop around. If the data shows you’re a passive customer who has stayed with the same company for five years, your rates will steadily creep up simply because the system knows you won't leave, while a brand-new customer with the exact same risk profile gets a vastly cheaper rate next door.
The biggest open secret in insurance that the public doesn’t realize is that most carriers aren’t really making their money off your premiums—they are essentially massive hedge funds wearing a hard hat. The actual goal of an insurance company is to collect billions in premiums, pay out as little as possible in claims for as long as possible, and invest that massive pile of money (the "float") into real estate, private equity, and high-yield markets. The premiums you pay just give us the chip stack to play Wall Street, which is why a company can technically lose money on coverage for years and still report record-breaking profits. Because of this, the entire claims process isn't just about verifying if your loss was real; it's heavily engineered as a game of administrative attrition. Initial denials, endless requests for repetitive paperwork, and confusing policy jargon aren't always accidental red tape—they're calculated friction. Regulators know it, and the industry knows it, but the business model relies on the fact that a massive percentage of people will simply get exhausted, frustrated, or confused and give up on pursuing a payout they’re fully entitled to. On top of that, your loyalty to an insurance carrier is actively weaponized against you through something called "price optimization." Actuarial algorithms don't just calculate your actual risk of having an accident or a house fire; they calculate how likely you are to notice a rate hike and shop around. If the data shows you’re a passive customer who has stayed with the same company for five years, your rates will steadily creep up simply because the system knows you won't leave, while a brand-new customer with the exact same risk profile gets a vastly cheaper rate next door.
What the replies added1
ooo thank you for the phrase "calculated friction"
I'm a produce clerk. The amount of times that something has hit the cooler floor and I've just swept in back into it's container like nothing happened is pretty bad. Wash your produce folks.
I'm a produce clerk. The amount of times that something has hit the cooler floor and I've just swept in back into it's container like nothing happened is pretty bad. Wash your produce folks.
In an ophtamology med. Many people believe the blue filter of the glasses helps with vision protection. This is essentially a "yes, but actually no" situation. Blue filter is recommended for people whose prescription is relatively low and/or work or study a lot with computers or like using screens (gamers, desingers, etc.). While blue filter does block a certain type of color, the reason why people feel they vision gets damaged is because they don't blink enough. Blinking bathes the cornea and the sclera with a new tear film and protects and nourishes them, but sometimes people are so focused on the screens that they forget to blink. This is also why people with these problem often have symptoms of dry eye. Interestingly, another reason the blue filter is recommended is because part of the electrochemical impulse that transforms light from outside into images in the retina (and then goes to the brain) doesn't go to the brain 100%. Part of it also goes to the sector of pupila retraction (Edinger Westphal nucleus) to regulate the pupila according to the amount of light present, and the other part goes to the sector of the brain which regulates melatonin (cicle of sleep). And yes, there are studies that say that some of the cells in the retina, depending on how close they are to the macula, have more affinity with blue light. So, people with blue filter should also be recommended to have breaks of 20 minutes for each hour of screen usage (if we're generous) and never use the screen with 100% illumination. The warm color mode is also a good alternative and kids most of all, should never use screens more than 1 hour and a half daily in general. Less if younger. But we all know how most parents are with that nowadays. TLDR: Blue filter in glasses won't really help you if you don't use screens responsibly yourself.
In an ophtamology med. Many people believe the blue filter of the glasses helps with vision protection. This is essentially a "yes, but actually no" situation. Blue filter is recommended for people whose prescription is relatively low and/or work or study a lot with computers or like using screens (gamers, desingers, etc.). While blue filter does block a certain type of color, the reason why people feel they vision gets damaged is because they don't blink enough. Blinking bathes the cornea and the sclera with a new tear film and protects and nourishes them, but sometimes people are so focused on the screens that they forget to blink. This is also why people with these problem often have symptoms of dry eye. Interestingly, another reason the blue filter is recommended is because part of the electrochemical impulse that transforms light from outside into images in the retina (and then goes to the brain) doesn't go to the brain 100%. Part of it also goes to the sector of pupila retraction (Edinger Westphal nucleus) to regulate the pupila according to the amount of light present, and the other part goes to the sector of the brain which regulates melatonin (cicle of sleep). And yes, there are studies that say that some of the cells in the retina, depending on how close they are to the macula, have more affinity with blue light. So, people with blue filter should also be recommended to have breaks of 20 minutes for each hour of screen usage (if we're generous) and never use the screen with 100% illumination. The warm color mode is also a good alternative and kids most of all, should never use screens more than 1 hour and a half daily in general. Less if younger. But we all know how most parents are with that nowadays. TLDR: Blue filter in glasses won't really help you if you don't use screens responsibly yourself.
Alcohol is not "empowering," in fact its addictive and quite damaging.
Alcohol is not "empowering," in fact its addictive and quite damaging.
Worked in a pharmaceutical manufacturing and shipping plant. Almost all over the counter medicine is simply relabeled and sent to the corresponding company. All the big chains use the exact same product, just with their label on it.
Worked in a pharmaceutical manufacturing and shipping plant. Almost all over the counter medicine is simply relabeled and sent to the corresponding company. All the big chains use the exact same product, just with their label on it.
I used to work at a 24/7 McDonald’s. all cooked product has a shelf life of about an hour and then you have to throw it out. after 10pm, that doesn’t happen because orders are too unpredictable and food wastage would get the manager fired if we actually followed the procedure, and also drunk idiots won’t tolerate waiting for fresh stuff to cook. also grills have to be cleaned at some stage, but we’re on skeleton crew levels of staff until 7am, so if orders come in you’ve got to stop cleaning to make the orders so if you’re one of those drunken idiots that come in between 2-3am, your beef patties could have been sitting there since about 9pm
I used to work at a 24/7 McDonald’s. all cooked product has a shelf life of about an hour and then you have to throw it out. after 10pm, that doesn’t happen because orders are too unpredictable and food wastage would get the manager fired if we actually followed the procedure, and also drunk idiots won’t tolerate waiting for fresh stuff to cook. also grills have to be cleaned at some stage, but we’re on skeleton crew levels of staff until 7am, so if orders come in you’ve got to stop cleaning to make the orders so if you’re one of those drunken idiots that come in between 2-3am, your beef patties could have been sitting there since about 9pm
Cows have to be actively pregnant to produce milk
Cows have to be actively pregnant to produce milk
Most people think supplements are FDA approved before they’re sold. They’re not. “Natural” doesn’t automatically mean safe. Plenty of natural ingredients can have side effects or interact with medications. Expensive doesn’t necessarily mean better. A lot of the price is just marketing and branding. “Clinically proven” often sounds more impressive than it is. Sometimes it’s based on one small or weak study. Third-party tested and FDA approved are completely different things, but a lot of people use them interchangeably.
Most people think supplements are FDA approved before they’re sold. They’re not. “Natural” doesn’t automatically mean safe. Plenty of natural ingredients can have side effects or interact with medications. Expensive doesn’t necessarily mean better. A lot of the price is just marketing and branding. “Clinically proven” often sounds more impressive than it is. Sometimes it’s based on one small or weak study. Third-party tested and FDA approved are completely different things, but a lot of people use them interchangeably.
Airline. Don't check a bag with lithium batteries in it. Carry them on. People don't pay attention to this requirement when checking the boxes, and it's the next disaster waiting to happen.
Airline. Don't check a bag with lithium batteries in it. Carry them on. People don't pay attention to this requirement when checking the boxes, and it's the next disaster waiting to happen.
A lot of money spent on cancer research is wasted off the bat because a lot of the the originating stock for the cell lines people use for research are contaminated, and no one is willing to deal with it. It's a lot more complicated than that for sure, but I tried to distill it to a relatively short sentence.
A lot of money spent on cancer research is wasted off the bat because a lot of the the originating stock for the cell lines people use for research are contaminated, and no one is willing to deal with it. It's a lot more complicated than that for sure, but I tried to distill it to a relatively short sentence.
In agriculture there is an insect called psylla. The bug eats the fruit on the tree and then sh*ts on the fruit which causes the fruit to be sticky.
In agriculture there is an insect called psylla. The bug eats the fruit on the tree and then sh*ts on the fruit which causes the fruit to be sticky.
I managed a family florist and gift/events and wedding services business for over 15 years. Several "open" known secrets within the trade. 1. Flowers usually come shipped to a florist "dry packed" which means they are cut at the farm (usually Equador, Columbia, etc) wrapped in bundles depending on size and packaged into large boxes for shipment. The travel route for Florida is usually FARM (south america) > miami (where many will go to the miami flowers market where florists can go in person and bid on/purchase them or bid and purchase online and have them shipped) > florist. If the florist buys from a wholesale florist and not directly from the farm or company importing them, the route adds a stop, Miami > wholesaler > florist. The wholesaler can be in the same city or close by but is often out of the city or even state, depending on which one is used. For example, flowers purchased in North Florida can come from Dothan, or Montgomery Al, or other places. It is MUCH cheaper to order them directly from the farm, but it is more convenient to get them from the wholesaler because there is usually a wholesaler running each day of the week so if a florist needs flowers for a special order or just more of something, they can pay more and get it same day. When they come from the farm, and bypass the wholesaler, sometimes the flowers have cold packs which help keep them fresh (especially in the hottest months of summer) but most of the time they are shipped as is, fresh cut, and by the time they reach the florist (sometimes 2-3 days later) they have still not ever been put in water. When the florist gets them, they "process" the flowers, which entails cutting them a second time at an angle so they drink better and allow more oxygen in, stripping the extra leaves or foliage off, and placing them in a bucket of clean water which has flower preservative in it. This is called "hydrating" when they drink for the first time. Flowers can last usually up to a week in coolers after processing but should be used much quicker for best results. ~~ When the flowers are ordered early to avoid holiday increased pricing, they are held in coolers in the original boxes and dont see water for up to an extra week, which means by the time the flowers go out to the customer, they are already over a week old, even if they have only been in water for 24 hrs. 2. In the summer, certain roses run between .25-.35c/head (rose). In the winter, they are a bit more but usually do not pass $1/head unless it is a specialty rose. Holidays and special seasonal times, roses can climb to $2-2.5/per head; Vases can run anywhere between $1-5/per container, sometimes more for the specialty items. ~ My point here is, a florist can charge $75-$100/dozen or more for roses arranged in a vase throughout the year. During a special season or holiday, (especially Valentines) roses can go for $100-200/dozen depending on the occasion and way they are arranged, variety of rose, vase used, etc. The most a florist ever has in a normal dozen roses is usually $20-25 and that is if a really nice vase or container is used (we're including wire, ribbons, cards and card holders, etc) and often the florist has as little as $8-10 in a dozen. So the markup is extremely high on roses, and it is not uncommon for a florist to make over $25k JUST in dozens/half dozens, etc of roses on Valentines. With an average of only $2500 in product, that is a huge profit of over $22k. JUST FOR ROSES, then there are mixed dozens with other flowers added in, assorted arrangements like daisies, carnations, etc, and of course the more exotic flowers such as lillies, orchids, etc. A single valentines (just three or four days) can make a good florist over $50k in PROFITS. 3. If a florist waits until holiday pricing kicks in for a holiday or special season, such as Valentines, Christmas, Thanksgiving, etc, prices can more than double for flowers and hard goods (vases, ribbons, basically anything not live and perishable) Florists should NOT do this, but often will place their order for flowers BEFORE the holiday increase in pricing takes affect. This in turn means they pay sometimes half as much or even less than if they were on holiday pricing, and also means the flowers come even earlier than they would have. Which means they have to be held for up to a week or maybe longer before they are used. 4. Funerals are one of the times that florists make the most money (profits) per order, because a florist might sell a standing spray or casket spray for $150-$1000 and they prolly only have $30-250 in it. A large funeral can make a florist thousands in profits, but one bad funeral piece can cost reputation because people expect a loved one's final flowers to be perfect and last until the funeral is over and the body is buried. 5. It is not uncommon for some funeral homes to hold the body of the deceased for up to a week until the family has paid for the costs of burial and other things. Sometimes people make arrangements and do not have the money to fulfill the order. Instead of burying the person and collecting later, some funeral homes will hold the body and only continue with services when the bill is paid in full. This causes extra odors and other issues (like more than one service at the same time) when people do not pay up front or on time. 6. Florists are supposed to wire every rose, which entails sticking a small gauge wire into the head ot the rose and wrapping it widely around the rose stem, bending the wire back on the stem when reaching the bottom or close to it. This makes the head of the rose stand taller and for longer, even after the rose dies if it is done properly. Often roses do not get wired. Wire is expensive, because it comes in very large, heavy boxes. Florists save alot if they do not wire their flowers. 7. Corsages and boutineers for weddings, prom, etc, are supposed to be wrapped and wired, and the stems stuck down into a water tube. This allows the flowers to drink water even after they are made and in use. Often Florists do not use water cubes and just wrap the stem, making it where the roses do not properly drink. 8. Florists often use "wire services" which are basically 1800-flowers, Bloomnet, teleflora, etc. These services cost alot and these are what is being used when you call one of those numbers and order through them. The florist is actually making the order, the "flower gatherer" as they are called such as teleflora, or 1800flowers, just is the platform used to order the flowers.
I managed a family florist and gift/events and wedding services business for over 15 years. Several "open" known secrets within the trade. 1. Flowers usually come shipped to a florist "dry packed" which means they are cut at the farm (usually Equador, Columbia, etc) wrapped in bundles depending on size and packaged into large boxes for shipment. The travel route for Florida is usually FARM (south america) > miami (where many will go to the miami flowers market where florists can go in person and bid on/purchase them or bid and purchase online and have them shipped) > florist. If the florist buys from a wholesale florist and not directly from the farm or company importing them, the route adds a stop, Miami > wholesaler > florist. The wholesaler can be in the same city or close by but is often out of the city or even state, depending on which one is used. For example, flowers purchased in North Florida can come from Dothan, or Montgomery Al, or other places. It is MUCH cheaper to order them directly from the farm, but it is more convenient to get them from the wholesaler because there is usually a wholesaler running each day of the week so if a florist needs flowers for a special order or just more of something, they can pay more and get it same day. When they come from the farm, and bypass the wholesaler, sometimes the flowers have cold packs which help keep them fresh (especially in the hottest months of summer) but most of the time they are shipped as is, fresh cut, and by the time they reach the florist (sometimes 2-3 days later) they have still not ever been put in water. When the florist gets them, they "process" the flowers, which entails cutting them a second time at an angle so they drink better and allow more oxygen in, stripping the extra leaves or foliage off, and placing them in a bucket of clean water which has flower preservative in it. This is called "hydrating" when they drink for the first time. Flowers can last usually up to a week in coolers after processing but should be used much quicker for best results. ~~ When the flowers are ordered early to avoid holiday increased pricing, they are held in coolers in the original boxes and dont see water for up to an extra week, which means by the time the flowers go out to the customer, they are already over a week old, even if they have only been in water for 24 hrs. 2. In the summer, certain roses run between .25-.35c/head (rose). In the winter, they are a bit more but usually do not pass $1/head unless it is a specialty rose. Holidays and special seasonal times, roses can climb to $2-2.5/per head; Vases can run anywhere between $1-5/per container, sometimes more for the specialty items. ~ My point here is, a florist can charge $75-$100/dozen or more for roses arranged in a vase throughout the year. During a special season or holiday, (especially Valentines) roses can go for $100-200/dozen depending on the occasion and way they are arranged, variety of rose, vase used, etc. The most a florist ever has in a normal dozen roses is usually $20-25 and that is if a really nice vase or container is used (we're including wire, ribbons, cards and card holders, etc) and often the florist has as little as $8-10 in a dozen. So the markup is extremely high on roses, and it is not uncommon for a florist to make over $25k JUST in dozens/half dozens, etc of roses on Valentines. With an average of only $2500 in product, that is a huge profit of over $22k. JUST FOR ROSES, then there are mixed dozens with other flowers added in, assorted arrangements like daisies, carnations, etc, and of course the more exotic flowers such as lillies, orchids, etc. A single valentines (just three or four days) can make a good florist over $50k in PROFITS. 3. If a florist waits until holiday pricing kicks in for a holiday or special season, such as Valentines, Christmas, Thanksgiving, etc, prices can more than double for flowers and hard goods (vases, ribbons, basically anything not live and perishable) Florists should NOT do this, but often will place their order for flowers BEFORE the holiday increase in pricing takes affect. This in turn means they pay sometimes half as much or even less than if they were on holiday pricing, and also means the flowers come even earlier than they would have. Which means they have to be held for up to a week or maybe longer before they are used. 4. Funerals are one of the times that florists make the most money (profits) per order, because a florist might sell a standing spray or casket spray for $150-$1000 and they prolly only have $30-250 in it. A large funeral can make a florist thousands in profits, but one bad funeral piece can cost reputation because people expect a loved one's final flowers to be perfect and last until the funeral is over and the body is buried. 5. It is not uncommon for some funeral homes to hold the body of the deceased for up to a week until the family has paid for the costs of burial and other things. Sometimes people make arrangements and do not have the money to fulfill the order. Instead of burying the person and collecting later, some funeral homes will hold the body and only continue with services when the bill is paid in full. This causes extra odors and other issues (like more than one service at the same time) when people do not pay up front or on time. 6. Florists are supposed to wire every rose, which entails sticking a small gauge wire into the head ot the rose and wrapping it widely around the rose stem, bending the wire back on the stem when reaching the bottom or close to it. This makes the head of the rose stand taller and for longer, even after the rose dies if it is done properly. Often roses do not get wired. Wire is expensive, because it comes in very large, heavy boxes. Florists save alot if they do not wire their flowers. 7. Corsages and boutineers for weddings, prom, etc, are supposed to be wrapped and wired, and the stems stuck down into a water tube. This allows the flowers to drink water even after they are made and in use. Often Florists do not use water cubes and just wrap the stem, making it where the roses do not properly drink. 8. Florists often use "wire services" which are basically 1800-flowers, Bloomnet, teleflora, etc. These services cost alot and these are what is being used when you call one of those numbers and order through them. The florist is actually making the order, the "flower gatherer" as they are called such as teleflora, or 1800flowers, just is the platform used to order the flowers.
I work in agricultural industry and the “organic” label is a hoax. Another way to make more money for the same product. They are not treated special nor are grown different. Similar concept to clothes “made in Italy”, as long as the end serves the “organic” approval which could be hand plucked instead of machine. No real way of identifying organic vs not organic. Sometime those that are not as fresh or have not been sold after a certain time, will be labeled as ready to eat. Such as avocados where they say “ready to eat today” etc. All produce is a way to make sure they are not wasted while trying to make more money off of expiring produce.
I work in agricultural industry and the “organic” label is a hoax. Another way to make more money for the same product. They are not treated special nor are grown different. Similar concept to clothes “made in Italy”, as long as the end serves the “organic” approval which could be hand plucked instead of machine. No real way of identifying organic vs not organic. Sometime those that are not as fresh or have not been sold after a certain time, will be labeled as ready to eat. Such as avocados where they say “ready to eat today” etc. All produce is a way to make sure they are not wasted while trying to make more money off of expiring produce.
What the replies added1
That reminds me of a recycling meme. There was a trash can with 2 openings. One was labeled trash and the other recycle. And it all ended up in the same place.
My previous industry: Every single health or bodybuilding supplement is a lie. One way or another it is wildly impotent with falsified claims barely squeezed through legal requirements
My previous industry: Every single health or bodybuilding supplement is a lie. One way or another it is wildly impotent with falsified claims barely squeezed through legal requirements
Employer Sponsored Coverage can still exclude pre existing conditions. The Employer Group healthcare plans are not governed by the ACA nearly as much as people expect. They are still governed by ERISA which hasn't been updated in decades. That is why healthcare costs can continue to rise. Because the stuff the ACA governs is still a minority player. Employers have no problem paying the increase in costs because it is all pre tax expenses. The plans are self funded so the government really can't do much to stop them from sheltering more and more money every year from taxes. Until they replace the tax benefits of Employer Sponsored Health Insurance by reforming ERISA, healthcare will not improve. They need to offer other financial products that can be pre tax or else they will have a tax increase and that just is not going to happen.
Employer Sponsored Coverage can still exclude pre existing conditions. The Employer Group healthcare plans are not governed by the ACA nearly as much as people expect. They are still governed by ERISA which hasn't been updated in decades. That is why healthcare costs can continue to rise. Because the stuff the ACA governs is still a minority player. Employers have no problem paying the increase in costs because it is all pre tax expenses. The plans are self funded so the government really can't do much to stop them from sheltering more and more money every year from taxes. Until they replace the tax benefits of Employer Sponsored Health Insurance by reforming ERISA, healthcare will not improve. They need to offer other financial products that can be pre tax or else they will have a tax increase and that just is not going to happen.
There is no standard for what constitutes a food safe pottery glaze.
There is no standard for what constitutes a food safe pottery glaze.
Every single restaurant is constantly fighting an uphill battle to keep pests out. Even the cleanest, most well maintained restaurants will occasionally get roaches or less commonly, rats. Most of the time they come in on deliveries - especially cardboard boxes. Roaches fucking love cardboard. The only thing that separates good restaurants from bad ones is how diligent they are at maintaining proper pest control habits to prevent a stray visitor from becoming an infestation.
Every single restaurant is constantly fighting an uphill battle to keep pests out. Even the cleanest, most well maintained restaurants will occasionally get roaches or less commonly, rats. Most of the time they come in on deliveries - especially cardboard boxes. Roaches fucking love cardboard. The only thing that separates good restaurants from bad ones is how diligent they are at maintaining proper pest control habits to prevent a stray visitor from becoming an infestation.
Most restaurant ice machines are a health hazard. A very high risk to your gastrointestinal health. They are not cleaned and sanitized nearly often enough, if ever, until they stop working altogether. To most restaurant owners and managers it’s an unnecessary expense and out of sight out of mind.
Most restaurant ice machines are a health hazard. A very high risk to your gastrointestinal health. They are not cleaned and sanitized nearly often enough, if ever, until they stop working altogether. To most restaurant owners and managers it’s an unnecessary expense and out of sight out of mind.
There is an FDA handbook for allowable number of insect parts, and sometimes maggots, in food production that we eat everyday. [link removed]
Why it matters: There is an FDA handbook for allowable number of insect parts, and sometimes maggots, in food production that we eat everyday. [link removed]
The companies selling peptides use Chinese knock off peptides that sometimes aren’t from an FDA approved facility
The companies selling peptides use Chinese knock off peptides that sometimes aren’t from an FDA approved facility
Prescription dog food is garbage- same process as making wonder bread: firebomb all the actual nutrients out, add synthetic vitamins back in, pour the slurry into a mold and burn it to a crisp. Clinics get a percentage of the food sales, vets are paid on a percentage of the clinic's annual gross, so it's in the vets best interest to prescribe the food. Everybody makes money, especially when they sell the client on a reorder/subscription plan.
Prescription dog food is garbage- same process as making wonder bread: firebomb all the actual nutrients out, add synthetic vitamins back in, pour the slurry into a mold and burn it to a crisp. Clinics get a percentage of the food sales, vets are paid on a percentage of the clinic's annual gross, so it's in the vets best interest to prescribe the food. Everybody makes money, especially when they sell the client on a reorder/subscription plan.
What the replies added2
I've worked in the vet med world for 14ish years (no longer) and this is bullshit. The most kickbacks veterinarians receive for dog food is *maybe* food for their personal dogs. Of course they get a small cut of the retail sale, but it's pretty minimal overall and virtually every veterinarian will just give you a prescription to get the food elsewhere if you ask. And prescription foods are never the first recommendation, and they are intended to be either fixes for temporary issues (like GI stuff) or used to manage diseases/conditions that are tough to treat on their own. No vet is trying to make money off of Precription Diet k/d; that means the pet's kidneys are failing.
This hits a little extra home to me - and I'm sure plenty of other pet owners too - because not long ago I had to put my cat to sleep because of kidney failure. He was 16, so not really young by any means, but he'd had kidney problems for most of his life and had been on a "prescription" (not actually prescribed, but had to be bought from the vet) diet for all that time. Not long ago I started hearing more about the kind of garbage these companies were putting in their pet food and advertising it as "healthy" and I really began to wonder just how much longer my best little friend could have lived, and how much less his discomfort could have been (especially in the last few months) if he'd actually been eating real, healthy food. Of course, I have no true idea about whether his diet really made any difference or not, but I feel so terrible at the thought that what we were feeding him might have contributed in some way to his health problems. And that just creates a market for pet food makers who go on and on about how "natural" and "pure" and "healthy" there product is, but they can absolutely lie about that and no one is usually the wiser.
Servers will often go for hours without washing their hands. Some restaurants do not have hand washing sinks handy, even if they're supposed to. Front of house staff, especially while busy, will be touching money, payment machines, dirty plates etc, and then touch your dinner plates, cutlery, cut your bread etc. Germ farms.
Servers will often go for hours without washing their hands. Some restaurants do not have hand washing sinks handy, even if they're supposed to. Front of house staff, especially while busy, will be touching money, payment machines, dirty plates etc, and then touch your dinner plates, cutlery, cut your bread etc. Germ farms.
Food that you buy in large supermarkets is left out at room temperature for hours while the shelves are restocked. It's almost never checked to see if it's over the 8°C tolerance that would allow bacteria to grow. Frozen food is the same. When supermarkets go through the night it's often the case that the products that won't fit on the shelf will be left warm all night. Smaller stores have less stock and also are less likely to fill at night so the cold chain is broken less often.
Food that you buy in large supermarkets is left out at room temperature for hours while the shelves are restocked. It's almost never checked to see if it's over the 8°C tolerance that would allow bacteria to grow. Frozen food is the same. When supermarkets go through the night it's often the case that the products that won't fit on the shelf will be left warm all night. Smaller stores have less stock and also are less likely to fill at night so the cold chain is broken less often.
What the replies added1
Food that you buy in large supermarkets is left out at room temperature for hours while the shelves are restocked. It's almost never checked to see if it's over the 8°C tolerance that would allow bacteria to grow. Frozen food is the same. When supermarkets go through the night it's often the case that the products that won't fit on the shelf will be left warm all night. Smaller stores have less stock and also are less likely to fill at night so the cold chain is broken less often.
At the pharmacy if they drop any pills on the floor they just pick them up and put them in the bottle again. No the floors are not cleaned regularly.
At the pharmacy if they drop any pills on the floor they just pick them up and put them in the bottle again. No the floors are not cleaned regularly.
What the replies added1
Not where I worked! It was an ltc pharmacy, and there were bowls placed around to drop them in, then they got put in the burn barrel.
The U.S. has over 624,000 highway bridges. 42% are 50 years or older, exceeding their operational lifespans, but most are still safe to drive over. 42,000 (or about 7% of all bridges) are in “poor” condition and require significant repair or rehabilitation. Many of these are heavily traveled. **In fact, this amounts to 168.5 million trips, every single day, across structurally unsound bridges.** Most people have no idea the condition of the bridge they’re driving on and will never give it a second thought.
The U.S. has over 624,000 highway bridges. 42% are 50 years or older, exceeding their operational lifespans, but most are still safe to drive over. 42,000 (or about 7% of all bridges) are in “poor” condition and require significant repair or rehabilitation. Many of these are heavily traveled. **In fact, this amounts to 168.5 million trips, every single day, across structurally unsound bridges.** Most people have no idea the condition of the bridge they’re driving on and will never give it a second thought.
What the replies added2
I am the person who definitely thinks about this, including when I'm in parking garages 😬, but the issue is, it's often one of the only methods of transportation on that route (especially if you are on mountains or by a lot of water). Sadly, the US is reactive instead of proactive by nature, so I doubt anything will be done until visible cracks or an implosion happens
[link removed] Unsurprisingly one party did not wish to fund the infrastructure bill listed here.
Cruise Ships. You think the entire crew is well trained to handle emergency situations? Well…
Cruise Ships. You think the entire crew is well trained to handle emergency situations? Well…
What the replies added2
I just watched a documentary about the sinking of the Costa Concordia and the amount of incompetence in that situation was staggering. The captain was in denial that the ship was sinking and was telling the Italian Coast Guard that they were fine. Meanwhile, passengers had assembled near the lifeboats and the crew were not only telling them they didn’t need to evacuate, but were actively impeding those who tried to do it anyway. By the time they actually gave the order to abandon ship, it had listed so much that some of the lifeboats couldn’t be launched because they would come to rest on the side of the ship. People died because of how the situation was handled. Then the captain abandoned ship with passengers still onboard, and the coast guard forced him back to oversee the evacuation.
Well god damn. They hit one stinkin iceberg and you just won’t let it rest.
I'm in the nuclear industry; public would be shocked to truly learn that its way safer than most other industries.
I'm in the nuclear industry; public would be shocked to truly learn that its way safer than most other industries.
What the replies added2
They wouldn't believe you, they don't want to believe you.
95,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel, kept in temporary storage across dozens of locations nationwide (USA). And the industry is adding 2,000 tons a year to the pile. You have a different definition of safe than I. Especially when the USA seems to love enabling and antagonising terrorists.
The airplane you are flying on fails all the time during flight but you don’t know it because of the way redundant systems take over. Flight critical systems often have triple redundancy with systems that operate differently (like primary hydraulic and secondary electromechanical) so the same mode of failure can’t affect the backup system.
The airplane you are flying on fails all the time during flight but you don’t know it because of the way redundant systems take over. Flight critical systems often have triple redundancy with systems that operate differently (like primary hydraulic and secondary electromechanical) so the same mode of failure can’t affect the backup system.
What replies pushed back on2
Yeah this is kinda not true. Even a failure of a SINGLE triple redundant system like electrical or hydraulic would be treated as an in-flight emergency and be remediated before that plane flew again Source: Airline and Military pilot
Yeah this is not true. Some minor things fail sometimes but that’s why there are backup systems. And the amount of times something fails that’s actually somewhat critical is very rare. Source: am airline pilot
The corruption in public construction contracts is built in. Change orders, claims, and other mechanisms are legal ways for contractors to screw the funding agencies on public projects. This is the real reason things like trains, highways, schools, etc go so badly over budget.
The corruption in public construction contracts is built in. Change orders, claims, and other mechanisms are legal ways for contractors to screw the funding agencies on public projects. This is the real reason things like trains, highways, schools, etc go so badly over budget.
What the replies added2
From hearsay this is common in Germany as well. Problem is that mostly the lowest bid just wins, if it makes any sense or not. Even if everyone knows that it will never be built for that price. At least in some areas they have supposedly adopted that lowest and highest bid get automatically thrown out.
what's your sources? It does happen...but I'm not certain it's as bad as you might think. Incompetence is probably more costly in public construction than 'corruption'.
There's no checks and balances to make sure your airline pilot is mentally healthy, and they would risk losing their license if they thought something was wrong and sought help. The regs were written in the 60's and have never been updated and the FAA refuses to do anything about it.
There's no checks and balances to make sure your airline pilot is mentally healthy, and they would risk losing their license if they thought something was wrong and sought help. The regs were written in the 60's and have never been updated and the FAA refuses to do anything about it.
Airliners get struck by lightning all the time. It's not a big deal. If you fly there's a real possibility you've probably been on one when it got struck.
Airliners get struck by lightning all the time. It's not a big deal. If you fly there's a real possibility you've probably been on one when it got struck.
Cement is not concrete and concrete is not cement.
Cement is not concrete and concrete is not cement.
Digital systems & data28 source-checked claim records
Fact-checked claim card with verdict, corrected or narrowed claim, concise explanation, named HTTPS sources, checked date and original source record: Digital systems & data
Source-backed answers are shown before diagnostics; the complete source archive remains below.
half the sites you use every day are held together by a handful of exhausted on-call engineers, a pile of scripts nobody fully understands anymore, and duct tape. a surprising amount of the internet is one expired certificate or one fat-fingered config push away from going down for an afternoon.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added2
Plus they just forced that one legacy engineer who came in for decades in flip flops and a Hawaiian shirt to retire. And he was the only one who understood COBOL or how the mainframe works. But they were able to hire 4 interns with his salary!
A few years ago an open source dev was having some personal issues and wasn’t able to keep up with development on his completely voluntary project that was an important component of major Linux distros. So he handed it off to a dev that was interested in maintaining the project. A dev that was *exceedingly* eager to get their changes committed to the next Debian release. [A backdoor *almost* got installed into all kinds of systems. Hospitals, schools, power plants, email servers.]( [link removed] The hacker used sock puppet accounts to put pressure on the original dev to get access. Just social engineering. *And they almost got away with it.* The backdoor made it into development versions of major distributions. A Microsoft employee noticed something was amiss and dug into it further. We were all 🤏 this close to a *major* fuck up.
The chances of your children's private info, including SSN, birthdate, birthplace, address, etc being leaked and out there on the dark web is fairly high because most school districts in this country have shit network security and work with SaaS vendors that house all this data and are also vulnerable. People heard about the big Canvas hack earlier this year. What people dont seem to realize is that hack wasn't unique and similar events happen fairly often across our country and sometimes to individual school districts. Its a real problem thats just being ignored by our government.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added2
Also, you don’t have to give your real SS to most people who ask for it. They don’t actually check. Even doctors offices. They just use your policy number and name to verify. Your SS is not typically needed. And what’s more frustrating, my info has never been leaked due to a weak password. Countless companies have obligated me to use 8 character passwords with symbols and numbers and a mix of caps and each of the times my data has been leaked it’s due to them having bad security.
Given everything in the Epstein files, it’s very evident that this country and this government don’t give a flying fuck about children and their safety.
I have been in academic research for almost 30 years, and the amount of cherry picked or just completely made up data in research papers should concern everyone. In the past it was very rare and now it is almost common practice. It's driven by the pursuit of increasingly scarce funding sources.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What replies pushed back on4
I trust you’ve seen this? [[link removed] Half of 3,900 social science studies failed replication. But, even worse, ZERO percent in education specifically. A majority in sociology. And not just replication. Zero reviewed education studies failed reproduction, ie., could not be confirmed using their own data and math. This isn’t science.
fellow academic here, this is likely field dependent, PI dependent and not the majority. In 2026 everyone knows the bad apples (see pubpeer, the popularity of retraction watch and Elizabeth biks blog) This post is only serving to drive distrust in the scientific community when it’s mostly not true.
Yeah, I did my university thesis based on a research paper, with the idea to replicate and extend a part of the algorithm. I contacted the authors, and one replied **many** months later, telling me that it didn't really work, that this other completely different technology kinda worked, but not much better. It had taken me so long to get a reply that I had already turned in the paperwork to do that thesis, and had already spent ~1000 dollars in materials (as a poor student, it was a fortune). I was stuck, so I just went ahead with it, I explained the issue to my professor, and we agreed to go ahead, and as part of my thesis find out in which cases it worked, kinda worked, or didn't work. I graduated, but it took me 6 more months than initially planned.
My spouse is trying to get back into academia. Since she's not affiliated with an institution yet, we've just been replicating papers using code in other languages or taking other approaches. It was eye opening to see published work with objectively broken code that provably didn't do what it said it did. Honestly, replicating work is nice. Way cheaper than gathering the initial data, and with compute being so cheap, the barrier to entry is low.
How much personal information people willingly broadcast without realizing it. You don't need fancy dark web hacks or breach databases. 90% of a person's digital footprint, routine, and history can be fully mapped just by stitching together completely public, harmless-looking breadcrumbs.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added2
Just because it's not done at gunpoint doesn't mean it's done willingly.
Or by calling my mom who's 82 and is in the beginning stages of dementia...I try to intercept calls as best I can and keep her debit card. She was wanting it the other day because a "nice man from Wells Fargo had noticed fraudulent charges but needed to verify her identity with her debit card # and pin code"
Software is terrible not because of bad developers or bad testing. It's the CEOs who make business decisions to placate stockholders by releasing too soon and/or ignoring known bugs.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
I'll disagree somewhat here. Yes, bad leadership sinks a ton of projects, but bad developers can be just as bad. Especially if they're senior enough to also be part of leadership. I say this as I've worked with some people who will deliver "the thing" that works exactly the way they want it to work without consideration for anything else. I've literally seen developers spend the weekend reverse engineering how another library does something just so they could re-implement it because they didn't want to take a dependency on the library. I've also seen an inordinate amount of time spent on getting around policies because they're "stupid" and "keeping me from getting work done" only to have said workarounds cause problems.
AI is a big lie. We built an autonomous agent pipeline internally because our CEO saw that Stripe did the same thing and automated 80% of PRs. We built it. It doesn’t work and still requires major human intervention to get production ready code. A team at my company just presented at a conference how we’ve automated most work using said tool perpetuating the initial lie that tricked us into building the damn thing.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Limit: AI is a big lie. We built an autonomous agent pipeline internally because our CEO saw that Stripe did the same thing and automated 80% of PRs. We built it. It doesn’t work and still requires major human intervention to get production ready code.…
What the replies added1
You have to be really careful with your prompts using it for research and production. For research, it will make up scholarly papers or court cases. Lot of lawyers are getting in trouble because they have ChatGPT doing their casework, and it's manufacturing fake court cases that, when opposition discovers them, can get the case thrown out and the lawyers disciplined or disbarred. For scholarly articles, it will manufacture fake articles. A lot of scientists have seen their names attached to fake articles, and they've figured out that ChatGPT basically looks for a "credible scientist," writes a fake article that satisfies the prompt, and packages the results. ChatGPT just looks for "credible scientist" and will attribute articles about one field of science to someone who works in a dramatically different field. For production, it will manufacture data from thin air. Particularly if you ask it to make cosmetic changes to a prior result. If you say something about making this "look better," thinking it will change the colors on the spreadsheet or something like that, it will actually change the numbers to make them look more attractive. Most of the things it's being used to do, humans know how to do, and there's not so much of a time crunch that it can't be done better by hand. I work for a water utility, and I've never been given a deadline to provide a report that was so rushed that I couldn't meet it with ease.
Data privacy is a myth On Reddit too.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
I'd go one step further and say that privacy has never existed. There's a reason so many stories are about the grandma watching out the window, or the nosy neighbor, or whatever. People only ever had privacy in digital space, and only for a very very short period in time. That is NOT to say we SHOULDN'T have privacy. I believe it's a fine goal to work towards. I just don't actually think any society has ever had more than the theater of it.
Free Wifi is a trap. Its data mining. They dont put it in as a favour to you, they're collecting i formation and corporations are using it. I dont know how it works but the amount of information they can glean from you is... Frightening. I was at a seminar on guest wifi where the company selling the access points was telling us about all the information gathering they are capable of... To them it was a selling point. To me it was a good reason never to log on to free wifi again
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
It gets even worse. Wi-Fi could be used as a surveillance system, similar to cameras, just using the signals and how they bounce off objects. Apparently it's so accurate, the method is capable of identifying individuals. [link removed]
Astrophysics. People publishing data from space instruments rarely have a good grasp on the details of how that instrument actually performs, especially if it's been in space for awhile. They'll still assume it's performing the same as it did when it launched, which is usually a more idealized version of that instrument. Results in general should have far larger error bars than published and it greatly weakens them. This can even extend to the teams that build the instruments. I was doing a in-depth analysis of two separate space-based instruments that SHOULD agree with each other and they never did. Two spectrometers, observing the same events, giving different results, with errors that don't cover each other's results.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
So is the current crisis in cosmology real? Or possibly just gross instrument error?
Prosecutors employ investigators who routinely check social media during pre-trial prep. Stop posting to your social media and delete your history. It’s low hanging fruit to use your public posting history against you. That goes double for divorces and triple for bankruptcy fraud.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
I used to work in cybersecurity. So much of the misery you are subjected to? Theatre, as part of a project built solely for some "senior leader" to be able to put their name on something. Much of the 'technology' is Emperor's New Clothes. Things like 18FA just to read today's lunch menu, or your corporate laptop seeing 99% CPU usage because of some ZTNA bullshit that blocks absolutely everything and prevents you from doing your job? Nah. That is a classic example of sealing all the exits only for the robbers to depart via the entrance. A lot of these hacks and data breaches happen because some teenager has spearphished your IT manager, or phoned up your helpdesk and talked his way into the VMWare estate. And nobody ever learns from it. The whole thing made me miserable and I began to seriously ask why I bothered.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Your college saves lots of data on you, including your birthdate, where you were born, where you went to high school, previous addresses, your mother’s maiden name, and other key data points. Basically most the things that allow identity verification. This data is captured when you’re a student and kept for decades/indefinitely after you graduate. Colleges are also non-profits and those with access to these databases aren’t always well trained in data security. Employees aren’t always fully vetted. These databases are a big liability to society, IMHO.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
I could fall off the face of the earth and my college's Alumni Association would still find me to ask for donations. It's uncanny.
In social media, most of the posts that ask open form questions are made by bots with a fuck ton of karma in order to make more karma so that they can sell that account to an advertiser later. You'd think that the mods of said social media would simply see right through an obvious marketing scheme, but they'd rather just ban the truth instead.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Market research The figures that look different at a glance might not be statistically different depending on a sample size and how close the proportion is to the "center" (e.g. 45% and 55% probably wouldn't be statistically different on a usual sample size). Speaking of a sample size, for many businesses it's enough to ask around 50-75 people to make a conclusion about a good share of population. And these people usually paid for their answers (though we are trying to hide the brand behind the study), so it's barely representative at all.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
How many big name companies are storing things like credit card details and personal information in plain ass text in a database.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Your online profile, collected from everything you touch electronically knows more about you than anyone you know. It knows more about you than you do. Any kind of IQ test, personality test, which celebrity am I quiz is a psychological profiling tool used to enhance the complete list of all your online activity. Think using a landline telephone helps? A hack called Salt Typhoon has permanently installed software to record every phone call made worldwide. It can't be fixed.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
People don't understand. Not even close. What advertising knows. Like. We know you better than you know yourself. We can make you depressed. Happy. Addicted. We can destroy your relationship. We can make you believe you want something. Machine learning algorithms with the amount of data we have on you are so fucking good at exploiting every tiny weakness in your psyche that you'd install adblockers in a hurry if you grasped even a fraction of the capabilities. And even then it's only moderately effective.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added2
I always think of this when people say “our phones are listening”. Like actually it’s even scarier, they don’t *need* to listen. The data and algorithms and marketing people have you down to a T.
> you'd install adblockers in a hurry Already done. *Years* ago.
The biggest open secret in computer science is that the entire modern digital world is a fragile house of cards held together by copy-pasted code, duct tape, and unpaid open-source volunteers. While the public assumes massive banks, airlines, and tech giants run on hyper-optimized code, billions of dollars in infrastructure actually rely on obscure software libraries maintained by solo developers in their spare time. Furthermore, a shocking amount of global financial transactions still run on ancient, 1960s-era COBOL code underneath slick modern apps. Because fixing every bug is too expensive, tech companies regularly ship software filled with hundreds of known glitches, simply filing them away as long as they don't completely crash the system.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
I know a guy who's a COBOL "job runner". He just runs the COBOL code and when it errors he manually goes in and fixes the data and runs it again. Has been doing that fully remote since about 25 years. He's in the top 1% income bracket and says he basically works an hour a day and waits for error messages the rest of the time. But whenever he takes a vacation all hell breaks loose.
Not my industry, but tapping a card that doesn't ask for a PIN is not secure. A Subway near me was caught stealing cards by capturing the RFID for customers that tapped the POS pad. Happened to me twice before I started using my phone's tap pay instead and keeping the card locked.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
I work in building profiles of reddit users. We post leading questions to get users to give demographic data about themselves so we can package it and sell it. Rinse and repeat. every day. It's all clearly explained in the T&C page 272 paragraph 6b.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
microsoft PCs done slow down because the machine is old. It’s designed to do that so you’ll buy another super fast PC and start it all over again
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Algorithm is a terrible word, used as a filler by non technical folks to describe anything they don’t understand. Algorithm is anything a program does. Basically any set of instructions is an algorithm.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Digital entertainment served via algorithms often includes deliberate frustrating experiences, designed to keep users more engaged. People don't get addicted to static experiences, much like a Casino where you lose 100% of rolls would garner 0 patrons. So they employ random reinforcement techniques, deliberately choosing when to show quality content, garbage content, ragebait content, etc... modeled after a pattern to get users addicted to apps. --- It's pretty commonly known in social media. But multi-player video games employ the same concept, called an: "EOMM" system: Engagement optimized matchmaking. Which is basically the video game publisher profiling users into buckets depending on communication styles/skill/playstyle. And then purposely fitting them into match-made lobbies designed around specific predictive outcome patterns (User will be more likely to play if next X games are X/Y/Z pattern) to milk engagement.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Telecommunications providers store audio-recordings of all calls for a certain period of time. If a customer reports a voice quality problem, they can access that specific recording to diagnose issues like bad audio or dropped connections. The recordings are also made available to law enforcement authorities for criminal investigations when legally requested. Once the retention period expires, the recordings are automatically deleted according to the provider's data retention policy.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
I work in cybersecurity. Almost every company has been hacked. If they haven’t, they’re going to be hacked in the next year or two. Most (like >70%) are social engineering. Phishing. It is surprisingly easy to get people to click on something and have them give their credentials in a fake login window. L
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
I used to support dedicated servers and eventually managed the abuse queue. Boy were there a lot of hacked WordPresses with fb, LinkedIn, banking login pages. And child porn. Update yer plug-ins folks
They (anyone paying for the service not just the government) can playback a recording of your session on a website. Not just the links you clicked, but like a screen recording showing what you saw on your screen while scrolling, where your mouse moved even without clicking, etc. it can be played back like a recorded video. You don’t have to click anything at all to give your “data”
Claim context: Digital systems & data
What the replies added1
Are you absolutely sure on that? I’ve worked in IT almost 13 years and I’ve absolutely seen technology with those features before I’m just a little skeptical (probably just hoping lol) that the government has such verbose logging including streaming video without the user having to install or at least accept a prompt on a private citizens personal computer.
Hospitals have notoriously shitty IT security and frequently get hacked/their systems encrypted.
Claim context: Digital systems & data
Where commenters report limits
AI is a big lie. We built an autonomous agent pipeline internally because our CEO saw that Stripe did the same thing and automated 80% of PRs. We built it. It doesn’t work and still requires major human intervention to get production ready code. A team at my company just presented at a conference how we’ve automated most work using said tool perpetuating the initial lie that tricked us into building the damn thing.
Source-record spotlights
I have been in academic research for almost 30 years, and the amount of cherry picked or just completely made up data in research papers should concern everyone. In the past it was very rare and now it is almost common practice. It's driven by the pursuit of increasingly scarce funding sources.
They (anyone paying for the service not just the government) can playback a recording of your session on a website. Not just the links you clicked, but like a screen recording showing what you saw on your screen while scrolling, where your mouse moved even without clicking, etc. it can be played back like a recorded video. You don’t have to click anything at all to give your “data”
Hospitals have notoriously shitty IT security and frequently get hacked/their systems encrypted.
Related evidence elsewhere in the index
What the counts show
Across 28 source records, the most common observable tactic structure is “Attach it to an existing routine” (3 records). This is a wording pattern, not a measured outcome.
What commenters explicitly report
These buckets are a deterministic partition based on explicit phrasing in the source text; they are not sentiment scores or effectiveness findings.
Observable tactic structures
Counts show source records whose wording matches the tactic structure; biological explanations remain commenter claims unless separately checked below.
Browse the original comments28 preserved records · 28 of 28 source records accounted for
Archive: 28 index entries preserve 28 distinct source records · Every displayed synthesis count resolves to source-record IDs
Education & research6 source-checked claim records
Fact-checked claim card with verdict, corrected or narrowed claim, concise explanation, named HTTPS sources, checked date and original source record: Education & research
Source-backed answers are shown before diagnostics; the complete source archive remains below.
I work in education and most of the decisions are made based on legal and funding issues, not child development or learning. We call them the "box people" who sit in cubicles 10 miles away from the nearest child and make decisions without a whit of experience or concern for the practicality of it all. It's especially bad for kids with IEPs or early childhood, where the whole thing becomes a tangled mess of licensing, SPED law, and funding. The actual children become data points, not people with needs. I really believe in public education but it is not currently functional. The bureaucracy alone is failing the kids before they even set foot in the building.
Claim context: Education & research
What the replies added2
God this. I have a child with Autism who was handcuffed by a school resource officer and the Assistant Principal. I am currently in the thick of complaints, appeals, and eyeball deep in legal work.
This sounds extremely frustrating, and I'm not surprised to hear it. I work in municipal government and that "box people" dynamic sounds familiar to me. (Ironically, I am the one in the box... but am neurotically conscious of the issue... and probably overcompensate for it sometimes). I do want to mention, though, that our only child will be going into first grade this fall. He's in a public district west of Minneapolis. His kindergarten experience was absolutely remarkable. I know the "culture" of any workplace is frustratingly abstract and sometimes just total fantasy; but this school, from the principal on down, consists of educators who are clearly invested in fostering an environment of acceptance, creativity, and encouragement. It shows up before any of the curriculum and, in turn, the kids seem excited to learn and they do it well. What impresses me the most is when my son and I are at the playground and elementary students of all ages are engaged with each other as decent little humans who genuinely care about the community. I guess my point is that maybe there is hope. I know the flaws in our education system are largely related to poor funding and bureaucratic structures (or lack thereof) and those things need our attention, but it's also amazing to me how critical the intangible "vibes" of a place are to our kids' development. But maybe it's the best educators who are in tune with this... and then we're back to funding I suppose.
Elementary school teachers and staff get assaulted by students everyday in every school. Not each teacher, everyday but in every school, everyday, at least one teacher/staff is assaulted. Parents don't think it's happening bc we're not allowed to talk about it (or they just don't care - as long as their work day isn't getting interrupted and they have free child care)
Claim context: Education & research
Most faculty have little to no training in how to teach effectively. Student ratings have zero correlation with learning. Most of the time they are completely ignored. Adjuncts are usually only paid a few thousand for teaching a semester long course, have no health insurance, and many are on food stamps and do gig jobs to survive. 80% of students go to community college with the intention to transfer to a 4-year university and graduate with a bachelor's. Only 15% succeed in doing so. Only 60% nationally graduate from universities, 40% in STEM disciplines.
Claim context: Education & research
What the replies added1
What are the reasons for the low success rates for transferring to 4 year universities?
My dad works as a high school teacher, he says “Parents and students think that the system of education works in the best way but actually the bad behaviors of some students in the class make teachers unable to show their full experience although they have it”.
Claim context: Education & research
Most professors have no formal training in teaching.
Claim context: Education & research
If you’re an academic researcher, working on federal grants such as the ones awarded by NSF, DOE, NIH or others, the academic institution will skim 50-75% of that grant in assessments and overhead. The PI usually receives 25-30% of the award.
Claim context: Education & research
Source-record spotlights
I work in education and most of the decisions are made based on legal and funding issues, not child development or learning. We call them the "box people" who sit in cubicles 10 miles away from the nearest child and make decisions without a whit of experience or concern for the practicality of it all. It's especially bad for kids with IEPs or early childhood, where the whole thing becomes a tangled mess of licensing, SPED law, and funding. The actual children become data points, not people with needs. I really believe in public education but it is not currently functional. The bureaucracy alone is failing the kids before they even set foot in the building.
If you’re an academic researcher, working on federal grants such as the ones awarded by NSF, DOE, NIH or others, the academic institution will skim 50-75% of that grant in assessments and overhead. The PI usually receives 25-30% of the award.
My dad works as a high school teacher, he says “Parents and students think that the system of education works in the best way but actually the bad behaviors of some students in the class make teachers unable to show their full experience although they have it”.
Related evidence elsewhere in the index
What the counts show
This report keeps all 6 source records for Education & research together and surfaces traceable examples without converting anecdotes into proof.
What commenters explicitly report
These buckets are a deterministic partition based on explicit phrasing in the source text; they are not sentiment scores or effectiveness findings.
Browse the original comments6 preserved records · 6 of 6 source records accounted for
Archive: 6 index entries preserve 6 distinct source records · Every displayed synthesis count resolves to source-record IDs
Environment & materials9 source-checked claim records
Fact-checked claim card with verdict, corrected or narrowed claim, concise explanation, named HTTPS sources, checked date and original source record: Environment & materials
Source-backed answers are shown before diagnostics; the complete source archive remains below.
I work in recycling. Metal recycling to be precise, but I have connections in plastic/e waste/landfills/residential/etc recyling as well Even if you recycle every possible thing you could and think you're doing your part, I'd say a solid third of it goes straight to a landfill without even the attempt to recycle it. Of what's left, maybe a third of that is rejected for whatever reason also to be sent to a landfill. The remainder is actually recycled in some way. There's a lot of reasons why but the biggest by far is simply greed Metal recycling is one of the better, if not the best industry as far as recovery and we still operate with the expectation of significant loss
Claim context: Environment & materials
What the replies added2
Some things can be recycled almost infinitely as they don't really degrade. Metal's one of them. Some things can be recycled because they're so cheap to "reuse" that it doesn't really matter. Things like paper. Some things can be recycled but only at some cost, so they're only used as filler in an otherwise energy-intensive process. Things like glass. And some things, while technically "recyclable" degrade when you do so and cost more to use than the (non-degraded) raw material does to create. Things like most plastics. The bottom line is: Unless somebody is beating a path to your door to take away your rubbish for free... it has no value, either itself or as part of a recycling process. Literally, money is a great analogue for how recyclable something is. If I left a bunch of metal out overnight with a sign to "Help Yourself", I guarantee much of it would be gone quite quickly. It has an inherent value that people will pay for the raw material itself, even in a form that's already been a product for decades. If I left out cardboard? Maybe someone would take a new box, or some toilet roll centres for their kids to do crafts with. If I left out plastics? Nobody would touch them. In fact, I'd probably be fined for littering. Nobody wants them. If those things had ACTUAL VALUE which was profitable after having been recycled... people would be scrambling to take them off me. As it is, I have to pay my taxes, which pay for thousands of tons of the stuff to be collected, which go to a recycling company, who have to be paid to do their job, which involves just ignoring everything but the actual profitable minority, recycling that (often at a loss, buoyed up by subsidies), to generate a 3rd-rate product that basically sells at a loss or it is used to "bulk up" the original product elsewhere because you can get away with degrading the original product by a certain amount without changing its usage, and thus it becomes profitable. If there's no money in it, it's not going to get recycled, and if you put money (subsidies, taxes, etc.) into it and it's STILL not getting recycled... that's because it's not worth doing.
At my child's insistence, we recycle aluminum cans separately and have done so for years. We also end up recycling our boxes in a separate facility rather than the municipal recycling mostly due to the size, but also because most recycling ends up in a dump or in a dump overseas. I've seen our recycling cans getting dumped into the general trash pickup, especially after a holiday.
I worked in the parks industry in Colorado. A certain amount of water is allowed for a city like Denver to keep its golf courses top-notch. That water comes from the western slope, up to several hundred miles away. If only a percentage of that water is used, then you are allowed that new, lesser amount. So they will just keep sprinklers running to avoid having any amount taken away. While the mountains might experience a drought and get hit with wildfires, devastating wildlife, farmlands and homes (due to excessive water use in the front range), the golf courses look great.
Claim context: Environment & materials
What the replies added2
It ought to be illegal to water golf courses. If the local climate supports grass, fine. If it doesn't, suck it up.
One of the many reasons you hear a *lot* of complaining about the Front Range from people on the Western Slope.
Work in trash, most of yalls recycling goes to the dump. Sometimes straight into a trash truck, sometimes the recycling truck just dumps at the landfill while these 2 examples are rarer it does happen. Most of the recycling at recycle centers just don't make it through and wind up at the dump for some reason or another. Like most plastic, except the shit milk jugs are made of, are just not cost effective to recycle anymore and when it was it was being shipped over seas to be used as fuel... Then you have paper/cardboard, this shit is easily contaminated. Wet? Cardboard has tape? Trash. Someone put a bunch of shit in their recycling can that also contaminate the paper products, shit some neighborhoods I've serviced was 60%+ regular trash in their recycling cans. And that shit wrecks the machinery that sorts that shit if it wasn't caught during hand sorting. Now with that said glass, cans, and milk jugs are consistently recycled properly. The rest is a crapshoot and highly depends on the center it's sent too and what your neighbors put in their cans. Fun bonus info shit you can't recycle but most people think you can: Shredded paper Bubble wrap Wood Styrofoam Plastic bags Electronics Rubber/tires Fabric Garden hoses
Claim context: Environment & materials
What the replies added2
We have a separate trash can with a blue lid for recycling, but every trash day I watch the truck come along and they all go right into the truck. It's not even a different compartment. The city recycling center where all that was supposed to go was shut down years ago, and the building now houses a bunch of road department equipment.
Wood can't be turned to paper? Is it bcsof chemical treatments?
Oil & gas industry - after the BP blow out in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, there were immense efforts to clean up all the spilled oil floating on top of the sea water. BP outsourced the clean up efforts to a company called Nalco which utilized a “dispersant” called Corexit. The dispersant is basically a fancy version of dawn dish soap. AKA, the oil attaches itself to the dispersant and becomes too heavy to float and essentially sinks to the bottom of the ocean out of view of any cameras and news networks. Yes, you guessed it, the oil is still there. Just sunk at the bottom of the ocean.
Claim context: Environment & materials
sooo much soil is polluted, it's crazy, and the governement would need a loooot of money to remove it all responsibly. meanwhile it all threatens our soilwater (our drinking water), flora and fauna. there's so much going on.
Claim context: Environment & materials
State environmental permits for discharging contaminants into a body of water are often written in terms of concentration, not quantity. In order to continue to operate while remaining compliant with the permit sites often just increase the amount of water they are discharging, lowering the concentration of the contaminant. Doesn’t make a damn bit of difference in the large body of water it ends up in.
Claim context: Environment & materials
Most water fountains don’t have a filter. You’re just drinking regular city/county tap water. The same water that flushes the toilet.
Claim context: Environment & materials
Most trees don't need to be trimmed. Big tree trimming companies that work for municipalities are the worst scum bags who lobby the cities and city tree guy to pay them to trim trees they sometimes don't or take a branch or two off. The only time trees need to be trimmed is if they are a danger to the public or infrastructure but just having a heavy/natural top is no danger. These trees have been around longer than humans and some how there's an industry profiting off of their abuse. We need more trees and it's great when these companies promote planting them where they'll survive but the shady side none of them admit is it's a for profit business and they need to be trimming regardless of whether trees need it or not
Claim context: Environment & materials
A lot of the drinking water you get from the tap is just the wastewater from upstream that has been treated.
Claim context: Environment & materials
Source-record spotlights
I worked in the parks industry in Colorado. A certain amount of water is allowed for a city like Denver to keep its golf courses top-notch. That water comes from the western slope, up to several hundred miles away. If only a percentage of that water is used, then you are allowed that new, lesser amount. So they will just keep sprinklers running to avoid having any amount taken away. While the mountains might experience a drought and get hit with wildfires, devastating wildlife, farmlands and homes (due to excessive water use in the front range), the golf courses look great.
Most water fountains don’t have a filter. You’re just drinking regular city/county tap water. The same water that flushes the toilet.
Most trees don't need to be trimmed. Big tree trimming companies that work for municipalities are the worst scum bags who lobby the cities and city tree guy to pay them to trim trees they sometimes don't or take a branch or two off. The only time trees need to be trimmed is if they are a danger to the public or infrastructure but just having a heavy/natural top is no danger. These trees have been around longer than humans and some how there's an industry profiting off of their abuse. We need more trees and it's great when these companies promote planting them where they'll survive but the shady side none of them admit is it's a for profit business and they need to be trimming regardless of whether trees need it or not
Related evidence elsewhere in the index
What the counts show
Across 9 source records, the most common observable tactic structure is “Use a sensory reset” (2 records). This is a wording pattern, not a measured outcome.
What commenters explicitly report
These buckets are a deterministic partition based on explicit phrasing in the source text; they are not sentiment scores or effectiveness findings.
Observable tactic structures
Counts show source records whose wording matches the tactic structure; biological explanations remain commenter claims unless separately checked below.
Browse the original comments9 preserved records · 9 of 9 source records accounted for
Archive: 9 index entries preserve 9 distinct source records · Every displayed synthesis count resolves to source-record IDs
Finance & workplace incentives5 source-checked claim records
Fact-checked claim card with verdict, corrected or narrowed claim, concise explanation, named HTTPS sources, checked date and original source record: Finance & workplace incentives
Source-backed answers are shown before diagnostics; the complete source archive remains below.
An overdraft fee is actually an incredibly high interest rate loan but, since they call it a fee and it doesn't vary with the charge amount it doesn't have to follow interest rate caps. For example, if you pay a $35 fee to cover $100 and have to pay it back with your next paycheck (assume 2 weeks) that is an interest rate of 913%
Claim context: Finance & workplace incentives
What the replies added2
Is there an effective way to get an overdraft fee waived? I don't care about ethics as an aside lol.
Yup and the scammers putting people into overdraft getaway with the victim paying it as well as the rest of the banks clients paying it off in essence. Then the bank gets to either right off total fraud losses to either insurance or in their taxes again at the expense of its clients
I work in finance. typically helping people with debt, budgeting, investing - most people don’t know that credit card interest accrues on a daily basis and that their APRs skyrocket to 30% when their accounts get maxed out. Most clients think the credit card companies on our their side….yeah they want you in the 40 year interest cycle lol. credit card companies are not your friends
Claim context: Finance & workplace incentives
Ex auditor of big 4. The audited report isn't as "yay no fraud" as most people think. There is even a line stating along the phrase "reasonably confident the report is not materially misstated". Don't take it as bullet-proof.
Claim context: Finance & workplace incentives
Tax accountant. No the the IRS does not know how much you owe. You want to be try to be precise as possible though incase you are audited. If you are audited then they will know exactly how much you should owe for that year.
Claim context: Finance & workplace incentives
I’m an accountant and worked for the IRS. I don’t think most people realize how common tax avoidance is, whether that’s just not filing a return or filing a return that understates the tax liability. The IRS studies something known as the tax gap. Simply put, it’s the difference between what the IRS calculates the country’s tax liability is versus what actually ends up being collected. The latest data from 2022 puts the tax gap at over $600 billion per year.
Claim context: Finance & workplace incentives
What the replies added1
When I started in industry, I was so shocked how many people didn’t file. I was naive and thought everyone paid in and filed lol.
Source-record spotlights
An overdraft fee is actually an incredibly high interest rate loan but, since they call it a fee and it doesn't vary with the charge amount it doesn't have to follow interest rate caps. For example, if you pay a $35 fee to cover $100 and have to pay it back with your next paycheck (assume 2 weeks) that is an interest rate of 913%
Tax accountant. No the the IRS does not know how much you owe. You want to be try to be precise as possible though incase you are audited. If you are audited then they will know exactly how much you should owe for that year.
I’m an accountant and worked for the IRS. I don’t think most people realize how common tax avoidance is, whether that’s just not filing a return or filing a return that understates the tax liability. The IRS studies something known as the tax gap. Simply put, it’s the difference between what the IRS calculates the country’s tax liability is versus what actually ends up being collected. The latest data from 2022 puts the tax gap at over $600 billion per year.
Related evidence elsewhere in the index
What the counts show
This report keeps all 5 source records for Finance & workplace incentives together and surfaces traceable examples without converting anecdotes into proof.
What commenters explicitly report
These buckets are a deterministic partition based on explicit phrasing in the source text; they are not sentiment scores or effectiveness findings.
Browse the original comments5 preserved records · 5 of 5 source records accounted for
Archive: 5 index entries preserve 5 distinct source records · Every displayed synthesis count resolves to source-record IDs
Government & public systems9 source-checked claim records
Fact-checked claim card with verdict, corrected or narrowed claim, concise explanation, named HTTPS sources, checked date and original source record: Government & public systems
Source-backed answers are shown before diagnostics; the complete source archive remains below.
Public Libraries have to beg local and state (mostly state) governments for funding. Most of the cool stuff your local library has added? Yeah that came from either grants or donations. The actual funding is fought for very hard every single day. The best thing you can do to support public libraries? 1) get a library card most importantly, 2) get involved and vote in local and state elections, 3) go utilize all the free shit available at libraries so we keep getting money to continue having that cool stuff for you guys.
Claim context: Government & public systems
What the replies added1
I love the resources at my local library. I get free printing credit each month, which is awesome since I don't own a color printer. They rent out passes for our local state parks so that I don't have to pay the entrance fee. I've also heard of them hosting fix-it clinics where people can bring in broken (small) appliances/gadgets and get help with fixing them. That's probably just a few of the many awesome services they provide.
I'm a social worker in a medium sized city with a bad reputation for having a lot of homeless people. I frequently interact with homeless folks, as well as people who are on the verge of losing their housing. You will often hear people say things like, they don't want to get help, they chose this, they're all on drugs, etc etc. Yes, sometimes that's true, but from my experience it is not the majority of cases. The most common thing I hear for why people become homeless is an unexpected loss of income. This could be getting fired or laid off, or an income earner in the home leaves or dies, or a medical situation makes it impossible for them to work. Things like this happen all the fucking time. So many Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, and if you lose that paycheck for even a month or two, everything falls apart. People can lose their housing in the blink of an eye. To add insult to injury, once you become homeless, it is so fucking difficult to get out. There are nowhere near enough resources for all homeless people to get sheltered. Even if they are determined to get into a shelter bed, it often takes weeks or even months. Even, and sometimes especially, families with children. There are just are not enough resources, funding, beds, counselors, etc etc etc. It's hard as fuck to find work as a homeless person. You don't have an address to put on a resume (or a laptop to make the resume). Homeless folks often lose all of their belongings in tent sweeps, including documents like IDs, birth certificates, etc. Folks living on the streets are frequently victims of theft and sexual assualt. They are exposed to the elements. Their bodies break down faster. And all of this is before we even get to the subject of how homeless folks are treated by everyone else, despite the fact that they may themselves be one or two missed paychecks away from being in the same situation.
Claim context: Government & public systems
What the replies added2
Its awful. I work in public and social housing and it was quite confronting hearing some stories. People that say majority are drug effected or immigrants are the people I love to re educate or destigmatise. Majority of homelessness in Australia are women over the age of 50, who have been devoted mothers or care givers. Went through a divorce or break up / loss of partner and as they had been out of work for years to parent or care give, they dont have recent experience that its so hard to get back in workforce. And because women earn less or have been out of work to care or provide, there usually isnt much in their super and they end up homeless at retirement. Its sad but hopefully with more people like us dropping comments here and there it will help spread more awareness.
I like the housing first approach to homelessness. You just put people in houses and then they’re no longer homeless, and THEN they can begin to work on problems like securing income, etc
Government agencies will blow money on shit that’s not necessarily needed at the end of the year to burn up the rest of the money in their budget. If they don’t spent all the money their budget will get reduced next year.
Claim context: Government & public systems
What the replies added1
In the US, the end of the fiscal year is in September so they will also keep shitty people on staff, keep broken machinery or other items that are "in the process of being reviewed for <dismissal/replacement>". They do this while spending wildly on bullshit to finish out the budget and have a reason to ask for more money every year. The US government, because of shit like this and a hell of a lot more, is one of the most inefficient groups of people (as a whole) I've come across in my years of working.
Screenwriters who write for TV don't really write specific episodes. The union requires that someone be credited for each episode and they technically do actually sit down and write it, but between the writers room thourouly outlining the episode and all the extra drafts and revisions afterward (sometimes even full rewrites) it would be much more accurate to say that the whole room writes every episode.
Claim context: Government & public systems
What replies pushed back on1
Disagree, only because not every show has a writers room. Only the big ones do. My ex-husband works on smaller shows and they literally only ever have 1 person writing each episode.
Military and commercial manufacturers bid for jobs. Much like getting a house remodeled by a handyman over a remodeling company. The projects go to the lowest bidder and budget restrictions are made for any improvement ideas from the workers that’ll produce better or faster results. All in the means to keep the management pockets full with bigger bonuses. So all the projects for commercial or military applications are therefore built half-assed and under budget. Quality is still there but with what you can make out of it. All these companies value innovation and efficiency yet when it comes down to it. They lack severely. So when you’re flying or using a specific hardware heavy technology. It’s very possible it could’ve been manufactured better or faster but it didn’t because someone’s pocket got full instead of the actual project. This issue also stems into every aspect of our lives. From doctors to lawyers to police to anything with a management oversight. They’d rather focus on their bonuses being hefty while our processes continue to be mediocre.
Claim context: Government & public systems
What the replies added2
They are more holding companies in my view. Holding long term contracts as a revenue stream rather than delivering a product. Like Jack Welch and GE.
>The projects go to the lowest bidder and budget restrictions are made for any improvement ideas from the workers that’ll produce better or faster results This is not entirely correct. For small projects, perhaps, but not large ones. There are a lot of factors that go into awarding a contract. Here are a few. 1. Ability to execute the contract 2. Design/plan to complete the program 3. Reputation of the company 4. Cost I have worked for a government contractor for 20 years and have lost contracts we were the lowest bidder on and won contracts where we were higher than our competitors.
The amount of money made in video games over encouraging dopamine and gambling addiction in children is so large that I'm honestly surprised there's been no serious attempts at legislation.
Claim context: Government & public systems
What the replies added2
The first part of your sentence answers the second part - money.
That's true and all but I found it funny reading this on reddit.
Those commercials for pharmaceuticals everyone says they hate? The odds someone sees an ad and asks their doctor about the drug? 80%. The odds that the doctor will subsequently prescribe it? 70%. Those are really big numbers. Notice how all the ads are for long term chronic conditions? No one-off 5 day courses of antibiotics getting air time. All the ads are for new drugs, of course. That being said, 95% of them are “me too” drugs. No better than what’s already available and likely generic: just another drug company wanting a piece of the pie and making you think it’s the greatest invention since sliced bread. Only 5% are novel, meaning superior or first of a kind. Big Pharma may be evil and pernicious, but they ain’t stupid.
Claim context: Government & public systems
What the replies added1
I'm a physician and despise those commercials. When I was a kid direct to patient marketing was still illegal. Difficult people may get it prescribed if the doctor just wants to keep them happy and compliant as a patient, but they are completely unnecessary. The doctors already know all about the drugs. In fact when I was in my first family medicine rotation they were still getting drug reps showing up with sweet lunches and their little packets for physicians so they could pitch us why their drug which was basically the same as standard of care should be prescribed instead. If your drug needs warnings a mile long, or you're talking about conditions like multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, subtypes of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, HER2/PR/ER triple negative breast cancer, etc... either you're a highly educated patient with a chronic condition you already understand the treatment protocol for, or you have absolutely no fucking idea what any of it means and whether you're a candidate or if it would even help you at all. You're right that often it convinces customers they're super smart and they should go pester the doctor because they're too dumb to think of it and if they don't want to give it to you it must be because they're bad doctors. I hate the whole pro-big pharma profit marketing system, it's complete garbage for providers and patients. The catchy jingles with bold claims and auctioneer-speed fine print are way more convincing that an in-office conversation about benefit vs risk, standard of care, the strength and validity of their published statistics, the mechanism of action, etc etc etc. So yes indeed the company gets to profit off patients insisting on something that likely won't benefit them if they weren't already on it, to the detriment of the patient and the healthcare system as a whole. Physicians are required to do continuing education and remain board certified and keep up to date with the latest literature and drugs, and the reps have worked twice as hard to make sure their brand name is already known by prescribers before those commercials ever flood your airwaves. Have I mentioned how pointless and absurd the whole thing is for the actual healthcare system and how much I hate it? It's everything that's wrong with our broken system (and country at this point): profits and corporations over cost and outcomes.
Almost no small businesses do what they should for cybersecurity of your data. They aim to check the minimal number of boxes to meet agreements and insurance requirements (and even then it may be more theatre than substance) Independently owned healthcare organizations are often even worse. HIPAA and other compliances are often incompletely implemented . If it doesn’t make money for the business and/or the risk doesn’t seem imminent- investments in security and even changes in basic behaviors are often ignored.
Claim context: Government & public systems
the computer code for banks is basically spaghetti held together with chicken wire and tape.
Claim context: Government & public systems
Source-record spotlights
Government agencies will blow money on shit that’s not necessarily needed at the end of the year to burn up the rest of the money in their budget. If they don’t spent all the money their budget will get reduced next year.
Almost no small businesses do what they should for cybersecurity of your data. They aim to check the minimal number of boxes to meet agreements and insurance requirements (and even then it may be more theatre than substance) Independently owned healthcare organizations are often even worse. HIPAA and other compliances are often incompletely implemented . If it doesn’t make money for the business and/or the risk doesn’t seem imminent- investments in security and even changes in basic behaviors are often ignored.
the computer code for banks is basically spaghetti held together with chicken wire and tape.
Related evidence elsewhere in the index
What the counts show
Within 9 source records, 1 explicitly report a benefit and 0 explicitly report a limit or failure. These are attributed experiences, not effectiveness data.
What commenters explicitly report
These buckets are a deterministic partition based on explicit phrasing in the source text; they are not sentiment scores or effectiveness findings.
Browse the original comments9 preserved records · 9 of 9 source records accounted for
Archive: 9 index entries preserve 9 distinct source records · Every displayed synthesis count resolves to source-record IDs
Health, food & consumer systems35 source-checked claim records
Fact-checked claim card with verdict, corrected or narrowed claim, concise explanation, named HTTPS sources, checked date and original source record: Health, food & consumer systems
Source-backed answers are shown before diagnostics; the complete source archive remains below.
Farmed salmon are so overcrowded that they get sick and develop sores. It's absolutely disgusting, and it's awful to see them suffering.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added2
I worked in the industry before in Canada, there is a grade they don't want you to know about called "Utility grade", this grade is the stuff of nightmares. I have seen fish with 3 eyes, two mouths, wavy spines, curvy spines, salmon shaped like a perch, skinny ones, fat ones, some with massive bellies that sag. so many genetic defects and diseases, absolute abominations, realistically they constitute maybe 5 to 10 % of a harvest. Shady stuff goes on in the industry , sometimes they harvest because an algae bloom killed all their fish, so people get called in to do a night shift to do an emergency process of the already dead fish, I know of one case where this happened for sure. They pollute the ocean and spread disease to the wild salmon stocks as well, nasty business.
There’s a really good documentary on YT about a Norwegian professor, long story short Monsanto (creators of agent orange), make the chemicals which go into the fish food (Baltic sand eels; already bad due to historical industrial run off around the sea), and the main chemical to stop it going rancid is Ethoxyquin. It’s highly toxic and can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, heavily regulated in livestock but not fish farming. Norwegians salmon had something like 10,000x the legal limit (salmon are predators with high fat content and the toxins carry upward through the food chain). The professor was made to rescind her paper and resign as the board of the university was also the largest stakeholder in Norway’s 2nd largest salmon farm. Edit: I think this is it for those interested: 2nd edit: Researcher not professor, context is the same. [[link removed]
The housekeeping industry. Housekeepers are under such tight time restraints (30 min per room) and given like 15 rooms to clean in 8 hrs that they are forced to cut corners. Never trust the coffee pot, towels, bedding (the duvet is never changed only if there’s a strain on it or it smells really bad or something), don’t trust the glasses, and don’t walk around barefoot. I’ve seen housekeepers using the toilet brush to clean the bathtub. And touching the clean towers after touching the toilet. Unfortunately there’s not enough time to really clean so we give the illusion of a clean room. Management only cares that the metal is shiny with no water spots, there’s no hair anywhere, and everything is in its place and looks organized. But really it’s gross!
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Limit: The housekeeping industry. Housekeepers are under such tight time restraints (30 min per room) and given like 15 rooms to clean in 8 hrs that they are forced to cut corners. Never trust the coffee pot, towels,…
What the replies added2
I have 25 minutes per room and I am to be done 5 hours sometimes 6 hours if we are busy. I work at a holiday Inn. It's ridiculous! I love cleaning and being a housekeeper but the room time are insane and don't allow for proper cleaning.
I cleaned rooms too but I had to quit because they wouldn't let me do my job properly. 100% quality scores but I was supposed to do the room in 15 minutes.
Fountain soda machines are disgusting 90% of the time. Even the places that claim to clean and service them regularly. The amount of time it takes to properly clean them along with poor placement means it's usually to much hassle for everyday employees to properly clean and replace filters of they do it all. I work with technicians that do service calls to restaurants and gas stations daily and the condition of almost all the machines is sickening.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added3
Restaurant and fast food ice makers are even worse
Same with most soft serve machines. I assisted my mom with her new store she got almost a decade ago now, we thoroughly cleaned the store and I began working on the soft serve machine, we had already ordered the maintenance kit, and a few other pieces for it, so i could go straight to work on it. I emptied the chambers for the creamers and the pan immediately showed a film of mold in both chambers, it was all the way through to the spindle that pressurise the cream before air is added. Its not uncommon but it shouldnt happen if you follow the basic maintenance schedule on it, which is done at least once a week. Took out all the necessary parts, cleaned them up, sterilised them according to health codes. Applied new gaskets and rotary shaft for the spindle (broken teeth on the gear, was a pain to fit) applied new lubes, new gasket and reassembled, ran through a batch of creamer on both sides, cleaned with water and then a refill. Then it was ready. The soft serve was sooooo much better that when the little local newspaper came in, when writing a story about the new manager. They wrote that the new life in the shop had even made the soft serve taste better, if only they knew.
I worked at a lunchroom which was actually really clean because they made it important to be clean. Simple things like putting dates on everything and throwing it out in time, cleaning the coffee machine everyday, the oven every week, changing the fryer oil often, things like that. Then a few months after I left, other owners took over. A few months in, their coffee machine stopped working, their snacks tasted a bit off, bread tasted burnt. Turns out, they wouldn't change the fryer oil enough, cleaned the oven properly, hadn't cleaned the dishwasher (cutlery and plates weren't clean)... And didn't even know the coffee machine had its own cleaning program. They had to rehire the old manager to _explain_ the cleaning to them. They also found a *completely mouldy blue* snack behind some drawers 😭 It was disgusting, disregarded most of her advice, and they just laughed it off.
If you are ever on a long term care insurance plan to receive assistance from a home health aide, DME, etc. There are two facts: 1. Case managers are actively being told to give you the least amount of hours of assistance per week as possible. 2. If you become the ultimate Karen you will ALWAYS get what you ask for. It will take time to go up the chain but you will win. 50 hours of care per week? Complain. New shower? Complain. New Wheelchair? Complain. I'm talking daily conversations with the worker, supervisor, regional manager, etc. I promise you, it will get done. So be the squeaky wheel. Insurance banks on you giving up the fight and they don't want to deal with a judge in a hearing over the issue. They'll give in eventually.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added1
DME is tough because margins are extremely low to the point these companies can barely hit positive ebitda. Really the insurance companies have them on such a loop with fee schedules and lowering margins each year that it may come a time DME is just not worth it to do anymore. Insurance companies need to raise rates and increase fee schedules so patients can be happy. Not even including the nonsense of prior auth hoops, time wasting denials, and needless amounts of documentation.
Chefs in restaurants don’t wear gloves hardly ever- because gloves are dirty and gross. Corporate places that insist on gloves result in cooks wearing the gloves for a long period of time, resulting in cross contamination. If I’m making your food without gloves I am very clean and tidy and I wash my hands a lot. I only wear them when dealing with sloppy wet stuff. What I’m saying is that gloves are in absolutely no way a sign of cleanliness or lack of contamination.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added1
I would go through a box a day when I was working the line, espically the OG Chili's Tenders. The place I was at during COVID even had a line watch, if we touched anything like our face our another product, a reminder to change gloves. When I was FOH there every time you entered the Kitchen Glove change. Its' not true everywhere. Yes I agree they give a false sense of security. But I still use them at home as a glove change is faster then a hand wash.
Vegetables that come canned are cooked in the can.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added2
Ive heard that peaches come in a can, they were put there by a man
That's the entire point. Everything inside the can is sterialised by cooking and has no access to oxygen. That's why canned food lasts forever.
Retired now, but your health insurance routinely denies anything out of the ordinary - challenge it!
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
I don’t know how shocking it is but at least in the US, all those regulations on chemicals like PFAS’ and other environmentally dangerous compounds? Those regulations rely on the manufacturers reporting their hazards to the DOT. If a company is, say, wrong about a hazard due to a lack of testing because they keep their labs stocked with out of date equipment, those reports aren’t necessarily gonna be accurate.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Lots of vodka and gin from “craft” distilleries is just bulk neutral spirits from larger more industrial distilleries redistilled to recut the heads and tails and incorporate botanicals. No starch conversion, sugar extraction, or fermentation is taking place on premises to create of these products.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added1
I've seen these at markets, local vodka which is just imported grape spirit and flavour
Agriculture. The amount of farmers and pest control/crop advisors who lie about what pesticides are being used on their crops is staggering. Even on crops that are technically organic, or are exported to other countries with stricter regulations. I work in one of the most strictly regulated states in the US and the reporting and auditing process basically amounts to "just trust me bro"
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Rabies testing (if required) means after an animal is euthanized, we have to sever their head, and one of us has to deliver the head (in a cooler on ice) to the state health department.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
The biggest open secret in insurance that the public doesn’t realize is that most carriers aren’t really making their money off your premiums—they are essentially massive hedge funds wearing a hard hat. The actual goal of an insurance company is to collect billions in premiums, pay out as little as possible in claims for as long as possible, and invest that massive pile of money (the "float") into real estate, private equity, and high-yield markets. The premiums you pay just give us the chip stack to play Wall Street, which is why a company can technically lose money on coverage for years and still report record-breaking profits. Because of this, the entire claims process isn't just about verifying if your loss was real; it's heavily engineered as a game of administrative attrition. Initial denials, endless requests for repetitive paperwork, and confusing policy jargon aren't always accidental red tape—they're calculated friction. Regulators know it, and the industry knows it, but the business model relies on the fact that a massive percentage of people will simply get exhausted, frustrated, or confused and give up on pursuing a payout they’re fully entitled to. On top of that, your loyalty to an insurance carrier is actively weaponized against you through something called "price optimization." Actuarial algorithms don't just calculate your actual risk of having an accident or a house fire; they calculate how likely you are to notice a rate hike and shop around. If the data shows you’re a passive customer who has stayed with the same company for five years, your rates will steadily creep up simply because the system knows you won't leave, while a brand-new customer with the exact same risk profile gets a vastly cheaper rate next door.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added1
ooo thank you for the phrase "calculated friction"
I'm a produce clerk. The amount of times that something has hit the cooler floor and I've just swept in back into it's container like nothing happened is pretty bad. Wash your produce folks.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
In an ophtamology med. Many people believe the blue filter of the glasses helps with vision protection. This is essentially a "yes, but actually no" situation. Blue filter is recommended for people whose prescription is relatively low and/or work or study a lot with computers or like using screens (gamers, desingers, etc.). While blue filter does block a certain type of color, the reason why people feel they vision gets damaged is because they don't blink enough. Blinking bathes the cornea and the sclera with a new tear film and protects and nourishes them, but sometimes people are so focused on the screens that they forget to blink. This is also why people with these problem often have symptoms of dry eye. Interestingly, another reason the blue filter is recommended is because part of the electrochemical impulse that transforms light from outside into images in the retina (and then goes to the brain) doesn't go to the brain 100%. Part of it also goes to the sector of pupila retraction (Edinger Westphal nucleus) to regulate the pupila according to the amount of light present, and the other part goes to the sector of the brain which regulates melatonin (cicle of sleep). And yes, there are studies that say that some of the cells in the retina, depending on how close they are to the macula, have more affinity with blue light. So, people with blue filter should also be recommended to have breaks of 20 minutes for each hour of screen usage (if we're generous) and never use the screen with 100% illumination. The warm color mode is also a good alternative and kids most of all, should never use screens more than 1 hour and a half daily in general. Less if younger. But we all know how most parents are with that nowadays. TLDR: Blue filter in glasses won't really help you if you don't use screens responsibly yourself.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Alcohol is not "empowering," in fact its addictive and quite damaging.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Worked in a pharmaceutical manufacturing and shipping plant. Almost all over the counter medicine is simply relabeled and sent to the corresponding company. All the big chains use the exact same product, just with their label on it.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
I used to work at a 24/7 McDonald’s. all cooked product has a shelf life of about an hour and then you have to throw it out. after 10pm, that doesn’t happen because orders are too unpredictable and food wastage would get the manager fired if we actually followed the procedure, and also drunk idiots won’t tolerate waiting for fresh stuff to cook. also grills have to be cleaned at some stage, but we’re on skeleton crew levels of staff until 7am, so if orders come in you’ve got to stop cleaning to make the orders so if you’re one of those drunken idiots that come in between 2-3am, your beef patties could have been sitting there since about 9pm
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Cows have to be actively pregnant to produce milk
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Most people think supplements are FDA approved before they’re sold. They’re not. “Natural” doesn’t automatically mean safe. Plenty of natural ingredients can have side effects or interact with medications. Expensive doesn’t necessarily mean better. A lot of the price is just marketing and branding. “Clinically proven” often sounds more impressive than it is. Sometimes it’s based on one small or weak study. Third-party tested and FDA approved are completely different things, but a lot of people use them interchangeably.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Airline. Don't check a bag with lithium batteries in it. Carry them on. People don't pay attention to this requirement when checking the boxes, and it's the next disaster waiting to happen.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
A lot of money spent on cancer research is wasted off the bat because a lot of the the originating stock for the cell lines people use for research are contaminated, and no one is willing to deal with it. It's a lot more complicated than that for sure, but I tried to distill it to a relatively short sentence.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
In agriculture there is an insect called psylla. The bug eats the fruit on the tree and then sh*ts on the fruit which causes the fruit to be sticky.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
I managed a family florist and gift/events and wedding services business for over 15 years. Several "open" known secrets within the trade. 1. Flowers usually come shipped to a florist "dry packed" which means they are cut at the farm (usually Equador, Columbia, etc) wrapped in bundles depending on size and packaged into large boxes for shipment. The travel route for Florida is usually FARM (south america) > miami (where many will go to the miami flowers market where florists can go in person and bid on/purchase them or bid and purchase online and have them shipped) > florist. If the florist buys from a wholesale florist and not directly from the farm or company importing them, the route adds a stop, Miami > wholesaler > florist. The wholesaler can be in the same city or close by but is often out of the city or even state, depending on which one is used. For example, flowers purchased in North Florida can come from Dothan, or Montgomery Al, or other places. It is MUCH cheaper to order them directly from the farm, but it is more convenient to get them from the wholesaler because there is usually a wholesaler running each day of the week so if a florist needs flowers for a special order or just more of something, they can pay more and get it same day. When they come from the farm, and bypass the wholesaler, sometimes the flowers have cold packs which help keep them fresh (especially in the hottest months of summer) but most of the time they are shipped as is, fresh cut, and by the time they reach the florist (sometimes 2-3 days later) they have still not ever been put in water. When the florist gets them, they "process" the flowers, which entails cutting them a second time at an angle so they drink better and allow more oxygen in, stripping the extra leaves or foliage off, and placing them in a bucket of clean water which has flower preservative in it. This is called "hydrating" when they drink for the first time. Flowers can last usually up to a week in coolers after processing but should be used much quicker for best results. ~~ When the flowers are ordered early to avoid holiday increased pricing, they are held in coolers in the original boxes and dont see water for up to an extra week, which means by the time the flowers go out to the customer, they are already over a week old, even if they have only been in water for 24 hrs. 2. In the summer, certain roses run between .25-.35c/head (rose). In the winter, they are a bit more but usually do not pass $1/head unless it is a specialty rose. Holidays and special seasonal times, roses can climb to $2-2.5/per head; Vases can run anywhere between $1-5/per container, sometimes more for the specialty items. ~ My point here is, a florist can charge $75-$100/dozen or more for roses arranged in a vase throughout the year. During a special season or holiday, (especially Valentines) roses can go for $100-200/dozen depending on the occasion and way they are arranged, variety of rose, vase used, etc. The most a florist ever has in a normal dozen roses is usually $20-25 and that is if a really nice vase or container is used (we're including wire, ribbons, cards and card holders, etc) and often the florist has as little as $8-10 in a dozen. So the markup is extremely high on roses, and it is not uncommon for a florist to make over $25k JUST in dozens/half dozens, etc of roses on Valentines. With an average of only $2500 in product, that is a huge profit of over $22k. JUST FOR ROSES, then there are mixed dozens with other flowers added in, assorted arrangements like daisies, carnations, etc, and of course the more exotic flowers such as lillies, orchids, etc. A single valentines (just three or four days) can make a good florist over $50k in PROFITS. 3. If a florist waits until holiday pricing kicks in for a holiday or special season, such as Valentines, Christmas, Thanksgiving, etc, prices can more than double for flowers and hard goods (vases, ribbons, basically anything not live and perishable) Florists should NOT do this, but often will place their order for flowers BEFORE the holiday increase in pricing takes affect. This in turn means they pay sometimes half as much or even less than if they were on holiday pricing, and also means the flowers come even earlier than they would have. Which means they have to be held for up to a week or maybe longer before they are used. 4. Funerals are one of the times that florists make the most money (profits) per order, because a florist might sell a standing spray or casket spray for $150-$1000 and they prolly only have $30-250 in it. A large funeral can make a florist thousands in profits, but one bad funeral piece can cost reputation because people expect a loved one's final flowers to be perfect and last until the funeral is over and the body is buried. 5. It is not uncommon for some funeral homes to hold the body of the deceased for up to a week until the family has paid for the costs of burial and other things. Sometimes people make arrangements and do not have the money to fulfill the order. Instead of burying the person and collecting later, some funeral homes will hold the body and only continue with services when the bill is paid in full. This causes extra odors and other issues (like more than one service at the same time) when people do not pay up front or on time. 6. Florists are supposed to wire every rose, which entails sticking a small gauge wire into the head ot the rose and wrapping it widely around the rose stem, bending the wire back on the stem when reaching the bottom or close to it. This makes the head of the rose stand taller and for longer, even after the rose dies if it is done properly. Often roses do not get wired. Wire is expensive, because it comes in very large, heavy boxes. Florists save alot if they do not wire their flowers. 7. Corsages and boutineers for weddings, prom, etc, are supposed to be wrapped and wired, and the stems stuck down into a water tube. This allows the flowers to drink water even after they are made and in use. Often Florists do not use water cubes and just wrap the stem, making it where the roses do not properly drink. 8. Florists often use "wire services" which are basically 1800-flowers, Bloomnet, teleflora, etc. These services cost alot and these are what is being used when you call one of those numbers and order through them. The florist is actually making the order, the "flower gatherer" as they are called such as teleflora, or 1800flowers, just is the platform used to order the flowers.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
I work in agricultural industry and the “organic” label is a hoax. Another way to make more money for the same product. They are not treated special nor are grown different. Similar concept to clothes “made in Italy”, as long as the end serves the “organic” approval which could be hand plucked instead of machine. No real way of identifying organic vs not organic. Sometime those that are not as fresh or have not been sold after a certain time, will be labeled as ready to eat. Such as avocados where they say “ready to eat today” etc. All produce is a way to make sure they are not wasted while trying to make more money off of expiring produce.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added1
That reminds me of a recycling meme. There was a trash can with 2 openings. One was labeled trash and the other recycle. And it all ended up in the same place.
My previous industry: Every single health or bodybuilding supplement is a lie. One way or another it is wildly impotent with falsified claims barely squeezed through legal requirements
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Employer Sponsored Coverage can still exclude pre existing conditions. The Employer Group healthcare plans are not governed by the ACA nearly as much as people expect. They are still governed by ERISA which hasn't been updated in decades. That is why healthcare costs can continue to rise. Because the stuff the ACA governs is still a minority player. Employers have no problem paying the increase in costs because it is all pre tax expenses. The plans are self funded so the government really can't do much to stop them from sheltering more and more money every year from taxes. Until they replace the tax benefits of Employer Sponsored Health Insurance by reforming ERISA, healthcare will not improve. They need to offer other financial products that can be pre tax or else they will have a tax increase and that just is not going to happen.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
There is no standard for what constitutes a food safe pottery glaze.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Every single restaurant is constantly fighting an uphill battle to keep pests out. Even the cleanest, most well maintained restaurants will occasionally get roaches or less commonly, rats. Most of the time they come in on deliveries - especially cardboard boxes. Roaches fucking love cardboard. The only thing that separates good restaurants from bad ones is how diligent they are at maintaining proper pest control habits to prevent a stray visitor from becoming an infestation.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Most restaurant ice machines are a health hazard. A very high risk to your gastrointestinal health. They are not cleaned and sanitized nearly often enough, if ever, until they stop working altogether. To most restaurant owners and managers it’s an unnecessary expense and out of sight out of mind.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
There is an FDA handbook for allowable number of insect parts, and sometimes maggots, in food production that we eat everyday. [link removed]
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Why it matters: There is an FDA handbook for allowable number of insect parts, and sometimes maggots, in food production that we eat everyday. [link removed]
The companies selling peptides use Chinese knock off peptides that sometimes aren’t from an FDA approved facility
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Prescription dog food is garbage- same process as making wonder bread: firebomb all the actual nutrients out, add synthetic vitamins back in, pour the slurry into a mold and burn it to a crisp. Clinics get a percentage of the food sales, vets are paid on a percentage of the clinic's annual gross, so it's in the vets best interest to prescribe the food. Everybody makes money, especially when they sell the client on a reorder/subscription plan.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added2
I've worked in the vet med world for 14ish years (no longer) and this is bullshit. The most kickbacks veterinarians receive for dog food is *maybe* food for their personal dogs. Of course they get a small cut of the retail sale, but it's pretty minimal overall and virtually every veterinarian will just give you a prescription to get the food elsewhere if you ask. And prescription foods are never the first recommendation, and they are intended to be either fixes for temporary issues (like GI stuff) or used to manage diseases/conditions that are tough to treat on their own. No vet is trying to make money off of Precription Diet k/d; that means the pet's kidneys are failing.
This hits a little extra home to me - and I'm sure plenty of other pet owners too - because not long ago I had to put my cat to sleep because of kidney failure. He was 16, so not really young by any means, but he'd had kidney problems for most of his life and had been on a "prescription" (not actually prescribed, but had to be bought from the vet) diet for all that time. Not long ago I started hearing more about the kind of garbage these companies were putting in their pet food and advertising it as "healthy" and I really began to wonder just how much longer my best little friend could have lived, and how much less his discomfort could have been (especially in the last few months) if he'd actually been eating real, healthy food. Of course, I have no true idea about whether his diet really made any difference or not, but I feel so terrible at the thought that what we were feeding him might have contributed in some way to his health problems. And that just creates a market for pet food makers who go on and on about how "natural" and "pure" and "healthy" there product is, but they can absolutely lie about that and no one is usually the wiser.
Servers will often go for hours without washing their hands. Some restaurants do not have hand washing sinks handy, even if they're supposed to. Front of house staff, especially while busy, will be touching money, payment machines, dirty plates etc, and then touch your dinner plates, cutlery, cut your bread etc. Germ farms.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
Food that you buy in large supermarkets is left out at room temperature for hours while the shelves are restocked. It's almost never checked to see if it's over the 8°C tolerance that would allow bacteria to grow. Frozen food is the same. When supermarkets go through the night it's often the case that the products that won't fit on the shelf will be left warm all night. Smaller stores have less stock and also are less likely to fill at night so the cold chain is broken less often.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added1
Food that you buy in large supermarkets is left out at room temperature for hours while the shelves are restocked. It's almost never checked to see if it's over the 8°C tolerance that would allow bacteria to grow. Frozen food is the same. When supermarkets go through the night it's often the case that the products that won't fit on the shelf will be left warm all night. Smaller stores have less stock and also are less likely to fill at night so the cold chain is broken less often.
At the pharmacy if they drop any pills on the floor they just pick them up and put them in the bottle again. No the floors are not cleaned regularly.
Claim context: Health, food & consumer systems
What the replies added1
Not where I worked! It was an ltc pharmacy, and there were bowls placed around to drop them in, then they got put in the burn barrel.
Where commenters report limits
The housekeeping industry. Housekeepers are under such tight time restraints (30 min per room) and given like 15 rooms to clean in 8 hrs that they are forced to cut corners. Never trust the coffee pot, towels, bedding (the duvet is never changed only if there’s a strain on it or it smells really bad or something), don’t trust the glasses, and don’t walk around barefoot. I’ve seen housekeepers using the toilet brush to clean the bathtub. And touching the clean towers after touching the toilet. Unfortunately there’s not enough time to really clean so we give the illusion of a clean room. Management only cares that the metal is shiny with no water spots, there’s no hair anywhere, and everything is in its place and looks organized. But really it’s gross!
Source-record spotlights
Farmed salmon are so overcrowded that they get sick and develop sores. It's absolutely disgusting, and it's awful to see them suffering.
Servers will often go for hours without washing their hands. Some restaurants do not have hand washing sinks handy, even if they're supposed to. Front of house staff, especially while busy, will be touching money, payment machines, dirty plates etc, and then touch your dinner plates, cutlery, cut your bread etc. Germ farms.
At the pharmacy if they drop any pills on the floor they just pick them up and put them in the bottle again. No the floors are not cleaned regularly.
Related evidence elsewhere in the index
What the counts show
Across 35 source records, the most common observable tactic structure is “Swap instead of subtract” (4 records). This is a wording pattern, not a measured outcome.
What commenters explicitly report
These buckets are a deterministic partition based on explicit phrasing in the source text; they are not sentiment scores or effectiveness findings.
Observable tactic structures
Counts show source records whose wording matches the tactic structure; biological explanations remain commenter claims unless separately checked below.
Browse the original comments35 preserved records · 35 of 35 source records accounted for
Archive: 35 index entries preserve 35 distinct source records · Every displayed synthesis count resolves to source-record IDs
Infrastructure & transport8 source-checked claim records
Fact-checked claim card with verdict, corrected or narrowed claim, concise explanation, named HTTPS sources, checked date and original source record: Infrastructure & transport
Source-backed answers are shown before diagnostics; the complete source archive remains below.
The U.S. has over 624,000 highway bridges. 42% are 50 years or older, exceeding their operational lifespans, but most are still safe to drive over. 42,000 (or about 7% of all bridges) are in “poor” condition and require significant repair or rehabilitation. Many of these are heavily traveled. **In fact, this amounts to 168.5 million trips, every single day, across structurally unsound bridges.** Most people have no idea the condition of the bridge they’re driving on and will never give it a second thought.
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
What the replies added2
I am the person who definitely thinks about this, including when I'm in parking garages 😬, but the issue is, it's often one of the only methods of transportation on that route (especially if you are on mountains or by a lot of water). Sadly, the US is reactive instead of proactive by nature, so I doubt anything will be done until visible cracks or an implosion happens
[link removed] Unsurprisingly one party did not wish to fund the infrastructure bill listed here.
Cruise Ships. You think the entire crew is well trained to handle emergency situations? Well…
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
What the replies added2
I just watched a documentary about the sinking of the Costa Concordia and the amount of incompetence in that situation was staggering. The captain was in denial that the ship was sinking and was telling the Italian Coast Guard that they were fine. Meanwhile, passengers had assembled near the lifeboats and the crew were not only telling them they didn’t need to evacuate, but were actively impeding those who tried to do it anyway. By the time they actually gave the order to abandon ship, it had listed so much that some of the lifeboats couldn’t be launched because they would come to rest on the side of the ship. People died because of how the situation was handled. Then the captain abandoned ship with passengers still onboard, and the coast guard forced him back to oversee the evacuation.
Well god damn. They hit one stinkin iceberg and you just won’t let it rest.
I'm in the nuclear industry; public would be shocked to truly learn that its way safer than most other industries.
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
What the replies added2
They wouldn't believe you, they don't want to believe you.
95,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel, kept in temporary storage across dozens of locations nationwide (USA). And the industry is adding 2,000 tons a year to the pile. You have a different definition of safe than I. Especially when the USA seems to love enabling and antagonising terrorists.
The airplane you are flying on fails all the time during flight but you don’t know it because of the way redundant systems take over. Flight critical systems often have triple redundancy with systems that operate differently (like primary hydraulic and secondary electromechanical) so the same mode of failure can’t affect the backup system.
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
What replies pushed back on2
Yeah this is kinda not true. Even a failure of a SINGLE triple redundant system like electrical or hydraulic would be treated as an in-flight emergency and be remediated before that plane flew again Source: Airline and Military pilot
Yeah this is not true. Some minor things fail sometimes but that’s why there are backup systems. And the amount of times something fails that’s actually somewhat critical is very rare. Source: am airline pilot
The corruption in public construction contracts is built in. Change orders, claims, and other mechanisms are legal ways for contractors to screw the funding agencies on public projects. This is the real reason things like trains, highways, schools, etc go so badly over budget.
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
What the replies added2
From hearsay this is common in Germany as well. Problem is that mostly the lowest bid just wins, if it makes any sense or not. Even if everyone knows that it will never be built for that price. At least in some areas they have supposedly adopted that lowest and highest bid get automatically thrown out.
what's your sources? It does happen...but I'm not certain it's as bad as you might think. Incompetence is probably more costly in public construction than 'corruption'.
There's no checks and balances to make sure your airline pilot is mentally healthy, and they would risk losing their license if they thought something was wrong and sought help. The regs were written in the 60's and have never been updated and the FAA refuses to do anything about it.
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
Airliners get struck by lightning all the time. It's not a big deal. If you fly there's a real possibility you've probably been on one when it got struck.
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
Cement is not concrete and concrete is not cement.
Claim context: Infrastructure & transport
Source-record spotlights
The U.S. has over 624,000 highway bridges. 42% are 50 years or older, exceeding their operational lifespans, but most are still safe to drive over. 42,000 (or about 7% of all bridges) are in “poor” condition and require significant repair or rehabilitation. Many of these are heavily traveled. **In fact, this amounts to 168.5 million trips, every single day, across structurally unsound bridges.** Most people have no idea the condition of the bridge they’re driving on and will never give it a second thought.
Cement is not concrete and concrete is not cement.
Airliners get struck by lightning all the time. It's not a big deal. If you fly there's a real possibility you've probably been on one when it got struck.
Related evidence elsewhere in the index
What the counts show
Within 8 source records, 1 ask a question and 0 explicitly say they intend to try the idea; neither signal is treated as an outcome.
What commenters explicitly report
These buckets are a deterministic partition based on explicit phrasing in the source text; they are not sentiment scores or effectiveness findings.
Browse the original comments8 preserved records · 8 of 8 source records accounted for
Archive: 8 index entries preserve 8 distinct source records · Every displayed synthesis count resolves to source-record IDs
How this catalog was built
Source: Reddit comments — one AskReddit thread
Selected comments from the discussion
This export carries real like counts and timestamps. The first 18 are the most resonant on-topic top-level comment from each stage of the discussion, ranked by resonance within their arrival-time cohort so later arrivals are not penalised for having had less time to accumulate likes. The last 6 received no likes at all and were chosen for the specificity of what they describe.
How the discussion breaks down
Relative volume of distinct source-backed records across every reviewed subcategory in this corpus.
Health, food & consumer systems
35 distinct coded comment records35 normalized answers under Health, food & consumer systems
Digital systems & data
28 distinct coded comment records28 normalized answers under Digital systems & data
Environment & materials
9 distinct coded comment records9 normalized answers under Environment & materials
Government & public systems
9 distinct coded comment records9 normalized answers under Government & public systems
Infrastructure & transport
8 distinct coded comment records8 normalized answers under Infrastructure & transport
Education & research
6 distinct coded comment records6 normalized answers under Education & research
Finance & workplace incentives
5 distinct coded comment records5 normalized answers under Finance & workplace incentives
What survives a 100-claim review
The pattern is not that commenters invent every problem. Public records often confirm a narrower core: systems have constraints, regulations have exceptions, and risks are real. The anonymous claims become useful when their scale, certainty, and causation are tested rather than repeated.
Read every original comment — free
The analysis above covers what the discussion agreed on. Members can browse the complete source archive: every comment we counted for this report, searchable and organized. A free account unlocks it on all SmartJots reports.